Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40695443›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2025

Rheological Assessment for Determining Form Stability of Wound Dressings.

Amit Gefen, Daphne Weihs, Astrid Fremau, Youtha Van den Eynde, Eveline Torfs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amit GefenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Daphne WeihsDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Skin Integrity Research Group (SKINT), University Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9670-3418
Astrid FremauMedical Department, Flen Health, Kontich, Belgium.
Youtha Van den EyndeResearch and Development Department, Flen Health, Kontich, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5216-4359
Eveline TorfsResearch and Development Department, Flen Health, Kontich, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3451-0354

Funding

Flen Health, Kontich, Belgium
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The classification of wound care products as form-stable dressings remains challenging due to the lack of objective and quantitative, material-science-based criteria. This study introduces a rheological testing framework to determine form stability of wound dressing materials. Using dynamic, oscillatory shear rheology, we evaluated the viscoelastic properties and responses of two tube-dispensed model dressings and compared them to those of honey, a high-viscosity liquid used in wound ointments. Measurements of the material storage modulus, loss modulus and phase angle demonstrated that both model dressings exhibit predominantly solid-like responses, confirming their classification as form-stable wound dressings despite being applied from a tube. The notably low phase angles of these dressings indicate structural integrity, which is essential for the mechanical protection of wounds; honey exhibited a liquid response and a high phase angle, without structural integrity. The reported laboratory method and findings support the implementation of rheological classification as a standardised, objective and quantitative approach for wound care product categorisation, independent of the packaging or application mode. Importantly, this study establishes a foundation for a material-science-driven classification framework, with implications for informed clinical decision-making and reimbursement policies.

Indexed as

BandagesMaterials TestingRheologyWound HealingWounds and InjuriesHoneyHumansViscositybioengineering laboratory rheology testingdynamic shear rheometerperformance assessmentsproduct classificationviscoelasticity

Identifiers

PMID40695443
PMCPMC12283118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.