ArticleInternational wound journal2025
Rheological Assessment for Determining Form Stability of Wound Dressings.
Article in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smart Polymeric Wound Dressings for Wound Treatment: Contributions and Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Copper-Coordinated Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels with Antibacterial and Anti-Inflammatory Activities.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Mitochondria-Targeted Hydrogen Sulphide Delivery via an Adhesive Hydrogel Modulates Inflammation and Oxidative Stress in Diabetic Wounds.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Oleogel Dressings for Skin Therapy: Physicochemical and Bioactive Properties of Cosmetic Oil-Based Systems Enriched with Essential Oils.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Novel Approach to Combating Antibiotic Resistance: A Chitosan-Based Nanocomposite with Green AgNPs and Gentamicin.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Rheological Assessment for Determining Form Stability of Wound Dressings.International wound journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The classification of wound care products as form-stable dressings remains challenging due to the lack of objective and quantitative, material-science-based criteria. This study introduces a rheological testing framework to determine form stability of wound dressing materials. Using dynamic, oscillatory shear rheology, we evaluated the viscoelastic properties and responses of two tube-dispensed model dressings and compared them to those of honey, a high-viscosity liquid used in wound ointments. Measurements of the material storage modulus, loss modulus and phase angle demonstrated that both model dressings exhibit predominantly solid-like responses, confirming their classification as form-stable wound dressings despite being applied from a tube. The notably low phase angles of these dressings indicate structural integrity, which is essential for the mechanical protection of wounds; honey exhibited a liquid response and a high phase angle, without structural integrity. The reported laboratory method and findings support the implementation of rheological classification as a standardised, objective and quantitative approach for wound care product categorisation, independent of the packaging or application mode. Importantly, this study establishes a foundation for a material-science-driven classification framework, with implications for informed clinical decision-making and reimbursement policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.