Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40695340›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025

Applying movement ecology models to comparative cognition experiments: a field test in hummingbirds.

David J Pritchard, T Andrew Hurly, Theoni Photopoulou, Susan D Healy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David J PritchardSchool of Psychology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7554-3470
T Andrew HurlyDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.
Theoni PhotopoulouSchool of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9616-9940
Susan D HealySchool of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8059-4480

Funding

Newcastle UniversityRoyal Society Newton International FellowshipUniversity of LincolnUniversity of St Andrews
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, evidence for spatial learning in animals involves experiments; however, tools developed for analysing tracking data are increasingly being used to infer the use of spatial memory and other cognitive processes in animal movements. In this study, we combined these statistical models with field experiments to analyse how patterns of hummingbird movements change as birds learn a rewarded location. Using hidden Markov models (HMMs), we used both changes in two movement states as well as experimental behavioural measures of spatial memory to determine how searching performance and behaviour changed as birds gained experience and how important local landmarks were for guiding search. Regardless of whether birds had a single training trial to learn a flower's location or 12 repeated trials, hummingbirds learned the location of the flower although performance suffered when we removed the local landmarks. While the hovering locations suggested that removing landmarks led to a slight decrease in accuracy compared with when landmarks were present, the HMMs suggest that this was part of a larger shift from a memory-led search strategy to a more systematic searching process. Our results suggests that models used in movement ecology could provide a valuable tool for experiments in comparative cognition.

Indexed as

BirdsCognitionSpatial LearningAnimalsMarkov ChainsModels, BiologicalMovementSpatial Memorylandmarksmemorymovement ecologynavigationspatial cognitionspatial learning

Identifiers

PMID40695340
PMCPMC12289189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.