ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025
Applying movement ecology models to comparative cognition experiments: a field test in hummingbirds.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-Dimensional Correlated Random Walks for Animal Movement and Habitat Selection.Ecology letters · 2026Article
- Applying movement ecology models to comparative cognition experiments: a field test in hummingbirds.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditionally, evidence for spatial learning in animals involves experiments; however, tools developed for analysing tracking data are increasingly being used to infer the use of spatial memory and other cognitive processes in animal movements. In this study, we combined these statistical models with field experiments to analyse how patterns of hummingbird movements change as birds learn a rewarded location. Using hidden Markov models (HMMs), we used both changes in two movement states as well as experimental behavioural measures of spatial memory to determine how searching performance and behaviour changed as birds gained experience and how important local landmarks were for guiding search. Regardless of whether birds had a single training trial to learn a flower's location or 12 repeated trials, hummingbirds learned the location of the flower although performance suffered when we removed the local landmarks. While the hovering locations suggested that removing landmarks led to a slight decrease in accuracy compared with when landmarks were present, the HMMs suggest that this was part of a larger shift from a memory-led search strategy to a more systematic searching process. Our results suggests that models used in movement ecology could provide a valuable tool for experiments in comparative cognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.