Quantification of the relative contribution of phase aberration and reverberation in transcranial ultrasound imaging: an experimentally calibrated fullwave study in 2D and 3D.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. A fullwave model of the nonlinear wave equation with multiple relaxations and relaxing perfectly matched layers for high-order numerical finite difference solutions.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026
   Article
2. Deconstruction and reconstruction of degrading effects in ultrasound imaging: aberration, multiple reverberation, and trailing reverberation.Biomedical physics & engineering express · 2026
   Article
3. Quantification of the relative contribution of phase aberration and reverberation in transcranial ultrasound imaging: an experimentally calibrated fullwave study in 2D and 3D.Physics in medicine and biology · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as