ReviewActa haematologica2026
Global Challenges in Paediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia.
Review in Acta haematologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging Indole and Azaindole Hybrid Agents for Leukemia Therapy: Recent Research Advances and Therapeutic Potential.Archiv der Pharmazie · 2026Review
- Toxicity during induction of pulsed versus continuous prednisolone in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a multi-centre, open label, randomised, phase 3 trial from India (2016-2022).The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2026Article
- Geographic and Socioeconomic Determinants of Treatment Abandonment in Pediatric Acute Leukemia: A Cohort Study in South-Central Mexico.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
<p>Background: Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) is the commonest paediatric cancer and represents a fifth of adult leukaemias. Global outcome disparities are linked to variations in socio-demographic indices (SDIs). Summary: In high-SDI regions, established collaborative groups report cure rates surpassing 90% in paediatric ALL. The focus is on reducing treatment toxicity using chemotherapy-free strategies, principally T-cell-directed immunotherapies and targeted small molecules, as exemplified in adult Philadelphia-chromosome-positive ALL. High cure rates limit testing of novel approaches outside niche subgroups, while high costs preclude wider real-world adoption of these advances. Mid-SDI regions (50-80% cure) face challenges in fully implementing contemporary risk-adapted therapy to improve outcomes and reduce costs. This necessitates collaborative practice, standardised high-quality risk-stratification diagnostics, and access to quality-assured generic cytotoxics. Low-SDI regions (<50% cure) report rising disease burden and face more fundamental challenges, including timely diagnosis, access to treatment and expertise, and minimising toxicity and abandonment. Solutions require locally adapted protocols, collaborative partnerships, and sustained patient-support programmes. Key Message: Global partnerships across SDI regions are crucial to address shared challenges in ALL, including access to affordable quality therapeutics, continuing refinement of established treatment elements, tailoring biomarkers for diverse populations, and collaborative frameworks to evaluate new treatments, technologies, and treatment paradigms. </p>.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.