ArticlePsychoneuroendocrinology2025
Neighborhood disadvantage and elevated CD14 gene expression among middle-aged adults: Findings from the Midlife in the United States study.
Article in Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Curvilinear associations of discrimination attributions with inflammatory and antiviral gene expression.Psychoneuroendocrinology · 2026Article
- Differential expression of lymphocyte markers by neighborhood opportunity among US adults: Insights from the Midlife in the United States study.Psychoneuroendocrinology · 2026Article
- Neighborhood Opportunity and Fatal Police Pursuits in the US.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Neighborhood opportunity and cellular senescence in a national sample of U.S. adults.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2026Article
- Neighborhood Opportunity and Genetic Literacy in a Representative Sample of US Adults.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026Article
- Discrimination exposure and lymphocyte differentiation: Results from the health and retirement study.Brain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2026Article
- Differential associations between relationship stressors and natural killer cell gene expression by race/ethnicity and sex among older U.S. adults.Brain, behavior, and immunity · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Social and environmental factors are crucial in health, partly through immune system programming that begins decades before chronic disease onset. This study quantified the associations between neighborhood opportunity and CD14 gene expression, a key marker of monocyte abundance and inflammatory potential in the circulating leukocyte pool. Neighborhood opportunity was measured using the Childhood Opportunity Index 3.0 reflecting Overall Neighborhood Opportunity and three subdomains (Education, Health and Environment, and Social and Economic Resources). Multivariable linear regression analyses among 1215 middle-aged adults (57 ± 12 years) from the Midlife in the United States Study revealed that individuals residing in disadvantaged neighborhoods had 36.6 % (95 % CI: 11.7-65.9 % elevation, p = 0.002) higher CD14 gene expression levels than those in neighborhoods with high opportunity, even after adjusting for key sociodemographic characteristics and health behaviors. The Education domain (27.5 % elevation, 95 % CI: 5.0-54.8 % elevation, p = 0.015) and Social & Economic Resources domain (32.9 % elevation, 95 % CI: 8.7-62.5 % elevation, p = 0.006) strongly tracked with elevated CD14 gene expression levels. These findings extend previous research showing how social factors "get under the skin" through sympathetic nervous system activation and altered myelopoiesis, producing a proinflammatory, glucocorticoid-resistant immune phenotype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.