Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40694661›Full record

ArticleInternational biomechanics2025

Comparing shoulder muscle activity in symptomatic and asymptomatic groups: the influence of normalization technique.

Angelica E Lang, Soo Y Kim

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International biomechanics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Angelica E LangCanadian Centre for Rural and Agricultural Health, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3952-1140
Soo Y KimSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maximum voluntary contractions (MVCs) are the standard normalization method for muscle activity, but can be hindered by pain and injury. Submaximal normalization may be a viable option. The study objective was to compare muscle activation between symptomatic and asymptomatic groups with MVC and submaximal normalization to determine if similar relative between-groups differences could be detected. Eighteen participants, divided into symptomatic and asymptomatic groups, performed isometric MVCs and six dynamic functional tasks. EMG data were normalized using MVC and submaximal values from a weighted overhead lift. MVCs achieved higher activation levels for most muscles, but submaximal normalization provided comparable values for serratus anterior. Significant between-group differences were observed during the Comb Hair, with higher activation in the symptomatic group for the upper trapezius, middle trapezius, and supraspinatus across both normalizations. The serratus anterior during the Overhead Reach and lower trapezius in the Tie Apron were also different between groups with both normalizations. There were some significant findings that emerged from only one normalization method. Submaximal normalization may be a viable alternative to MVC normalization for select muscles and upper limb pathological populations. Submaximal normalization allowed for meaningful comparisons of muscle activation patterns during functional tasks without the need for maximum force exertion.

Indexed as

Isometric ContractionMuscle, SkeletalShoulderAdultElectromyographyFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultdynamicElectromyographyfunctional tasksoverhead liftserratus anteriortrapezius

Identifiers

PMID40694661
PMCPMC12284987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.