ArticleTissue barriers2026
Concordance of claudin-18.2 expression in biopsy, resection, and recurrent specimens: implications for zolbetuximab therapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Article in Tissue barriers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Expression of Claudin-18.2 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Intra- and intertumoral discordance of Claudin-18.2: a systematic review and meta-analysis.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Review
- Article
- Emerging Precision Therapeutic Strategies in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: KRAS Targeting, DDR Vulnerabilities, Immune Redirection, and Tumor Microenvironment Remodeling.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- CAR-T cell therapy for pancreatic cancer: Translating emerging targets and dual-targeting strategies from solid tumors.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Claudin-18.2 is a promising therapeutic target for gastrointestinal cancer. However, its expression pattern in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, especially the concordance between biopsy and resection specimens, is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the consistency of claudin-18.2 positivity across different specimen types using the clinically validated antibody clone 43-14A employed in ongoing zolbetuximab trials. Immunohistochemical analysis for claudin-18 was conducted on 211 resected pancreatic cancer tissues, 133 matched preoperative biopsy samples, and 60 samples from recurrent lesions. The concordance between the biopsy and resection specimens was 92.5% using a 75% staining threshold. However, this high concordance likely reflects the large proportion of claudin-18.2-negative cases, as the biopsy sensitivity for detecting claudin-18.2-positive tumors was only 54.6%. This raises concerns about underdiagnosis and suggests that biopsy alone may miss patients eligible for zolbetuximab therapy. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that lowering the threshold to 20% in biopsy samples improved the sensitivity to 100%. However, patients meeting this threshold would still not qualify for therapy under the current trial criteria, highlighting a potential clinical dilemma. Claudin-18.2 expression was generally preserved in recurrent lesions (83.3% concordance with primary tumors), although reductions were noted in local recurrence and liver metastasis. These findings suggest that although biopsy-based assessments may be a practical initial tool, they should be interpreted with caution. Confirmatory studies on resection specimens using the same clinical trial protocol may be necessary to ensure the accurate identification of patients eligible for claudin-18.2-targeted therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.