ArticleHealth physics2025
A Novel Dosimetry Method for Small Animal Irradiators Using 3D-printed Mouse Phantoms and Alanine Dosimeters.
Article in Health physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tumor response and tolerability under fractionated x-ray irradiation in a mouse xenograft model.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractAccurate dosimetry is a crucial component of small animal and preclinical irradiation studies. Various dosimetry options are available but fail to characterize complex geometries and variable energy spectra of modern x-ray irradiators accurately. These options also lack national/international standards of recognition. This paper presents a novel dosimetry system, Dosequate, which uses murine phantoms embedded with alanine dosimeters and paired with x-ray energy spectra corrections to deliver consistent and accurate dosimetry measurements. This study compares Dosequate measurements against a Precision X-RAD 320 internal ion chamber and the treatment planning system of an Xstrahl Small Animal Radiation Research Platform. Results demonstrate the accuracy and reproducibility of the Dosequate system, highlighting its potential for standardizing dosimetry in preclinical research throughout the industry. Results demonstrate the accuracy and reproducibility of the Dosequate system, highlighting its potential for standardizing dosimetry in preclinical research throughout the industry. The Dosequate dosimetry method provides a robust and standardized approach for measuring absorbed dose in small animal irradiators. Its accuracy, reproducibility, and ability to account for complex irradiation geometries make it a valuable tool for preclinical research. This system has the potential to significantly improve the intercomparability of studies across different facilities and enhance the reliability of results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.