Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40694588›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

An overview of GabRat edge disruption and its new extensions for unbiased quantification of disruptive camouflaging patterns using randomization technique.

Masahiko Tanahashi, Min-Chen Lin, Chung-Ping Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Masahiko TanahashiInstitute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-3832-273X
Min-Chen LinDepartment of Life Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chung-Ping LinDepartment of Life Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-1472-5080

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disruptive colorations are camouflaging patterns that use contrasting colorations to interrupt the continuity of object's edge and disturb the observer's visual recognition. The GabRat method has been introduced and widely used to quantify the strength of edge disruption. The original GabRat method requires a composite image where a target object is placed on a particular background. It computes the intensities of 'frequency components' parallel and perpendicular to the edge direction at each edge point using Gabor filters, and summarizes the ratios of these two intensities around the perimeter of the shape. However, we found that the original GabRat method has an issue that produces false signals and biases to overestimating the GabRat value depending on the edge angle. Here, we introduce GabRat-R, which can diminish that angle dependency using Gabor filters with randomized base angles. Additionally, we developed GabRat-RR, which iteratively places a target object on a background with random positions and rotation angles to average the effects of the heterogeneity and anisotropy of background. Compared with the original GabRat, our GabRat-R and GabRat-RR programs run more efficiently using multithreading techniques. Those programs are provided as built-in features of the Natsumushi 2.0 software and available from the GitHub repository, https://github.com/mtlucanid/GabRat-R.

Indexed as

Pattern Recognition, VisualAlgorithmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID40694588
PMCPMC12282856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.