ArticlePLOS global public health2025
The impact of photovoice on mental health and stigma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Making individuals and needs visible: exploring the stigmatization against adolescents with mental health problems in photovoice practices.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Exploring the stigma of mental illness in life worlds of different economic pressure: a maximal contrast analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Photovoice is a transformative tool for improving health outcomes among people living with mental ill-health (PLWMI), fostering empowerment and social change. Only one meta-analysis has evaluated the effectiveness of photovoice for mental health outcomes. However, the study focused on various health conditions and only addressed two mental health outcomes. With an exclusive focus on mental health and stigma, this meta-analysis aimed to provide a comprehensive understanding of photovoice's impact on eight mental health and stigma-related outcomes in PLWMI and healthcare providers (HCPs). The study included seven randomised control trials (Sample size (n)=754), retrieved from electronic databases including Cochrane Trials, CINAHL Plus, ProQuest, Medline, PsychInfo, and Google Scholar, published between 2013 and 2023. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to calculate effect sizes (Cohen's d (d)). The study protocol was pre-registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023476867). Results showed significant improvements in mental health outcomes for PLWMI. Photovoice led to reductions in social withdrawal (n = 318; d, 95% CI = -0.20, -0.41 to 0.00) and depression (n = 267; d, 95% CI = -0.23, -0.45 to -0.02). Additionally, it increased self-efficacy (n = 267; d, 95% CI = 0.22, 0.00 to 0.44) and recovery (n = 285; d, 95% CI = 0.19, -0.02 to 0.41). However, there was a decrease in stigma resistance (n = 318; d, 95% CI = -0.13, -0.36 to 0.10). Among HCPs, there were significant improvements in both stigma and mental health-related outcomes, with reductions in anger (n = 330; d, 95% CI = -1.05, -2.79 to 0.69), social distance (n = 418; d, 95% CI = -1.41, -3.02 to 1.03), and the perception of danger (n = 115; d, 95% CI = -1.80, -5.04 to 1.44). The findings highlight the potential of photovoice as an effective intervention for improving mental health outcomes and reducing stigma in both PLWMI and HCPs. Consequently, photovoice can play a crucial role in enhancing the well-being of PLWMI and in transforming HCP attitudes within healthcare settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.