ArticlePloS one2025
Noncovarying storage effect: Balancing and positive directional selection on mutant alleles that amplify random fitness and demographic fluctuations.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Temporally variable environments in natural populations generate fluctuations in both population size and the fitness effects of mutant alleles. The theory of storage effect, a species/allelic diversity-promoting mechanism discovered in ecology, predicts that rare mutants with fluctuating fitness can be positively selected and then maintained in balanced polymorphism if one part of the population, the 'field', is exposed to and the other, the 'refuge', is protected from fluctuating selection. A recent study found that oscillation in population size modifies the storage effect such that positive selection on a rare mutant occurs if its fitness and the size of the field change in the same directions. By this new version of storage effect, mutants with even smaller geometric mean fitness than the wild-type can be selected to intermediate frequencies and remain in balanced polymorphism or reach fixation. To further understand these eco-evolutionary dynamics and test their generality in natural populations, this study built more realistic models that assume randomly, not cyclically, fluctuating selection and common demographic features, including heterogeneous ecological patches or an age-structured population. Mathematical analysis elucidated that whether balanced polymorphism or fixation occurs depends on the relative magnitudes of demographic versus fitness fluctuations and that both results require the discordant oscillation in the population sizes of the field and refuge. Therefore this novel evolutionary force is called 'noncovarying storage effect (NSE)'. Multi-locus simulations revealed that oscillatory polymorphism can be maintained simultaneously or reach fixations at many loci. The latter occurs in a wider range of parameters and, if the fitness effects of mutations change the mean absolute fitness of the population, leads to positive feedback between demography and selection that causes a drastic amplification of population size fluctuation. These results suggest that the NSE is a potentially prevalent evolutionary force in nature for maintaining genetic variation or causing large demographic fluctuations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.