ArticlePloS one2025
Teachers' perceptions of the differential impacts of a universal, school-based social and emotional learning intervention: A thematic framework analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Child and school staff perceptions and experiences of universal social and emotional learning curricula in context: A qualitative case study registered report examining 'Passport Skills for Life'.The British journal of educational psychology · 2026Trial
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trials of universal school-based (USB) social and emotional learning (SEL) interventions have reported that individual and socio-demographic characteristics may moderate outcomes, but it is not clear how. Teachers are key stakeholders in SEL and are involved in the implementation of interventions, so they can offer insights into patterns of responsiveness and intervention impact. This qualitative study aimed to explore teachers' perceptions of the differential impacts of the PATHS curriculum, a USB SEL intervention. Data were generated in semi-structured interviews with 105 implementing teachers as part of a trial of PATHS in 23 primary schools across Greater Manchester, and analysed using thematic framework analysis. Six main themes and 22 subthemes formed the final thematic framework. Teachers suggested that students demographic backgrounds influenced both engagement with and responsiveness to the intervention and that a certain initial level of social and emotional skills were needed as foundation on which to build further learning. The potential of teachers' expectations and beliefs about pupils' characteristics to impact on implementation quality and judgements of impact are discussed. Implications for practice and future research are considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.