Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40694544›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

"No reason for children to go hungry": Rural U.S. caregivers' perceptions of elected officials and their impacts on food policy.

Annie Hardison-Moody, Lindsey Haynes-Maslow, Sarah K Bowen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Annie Hardison-MoodyDepartment of Agricultural and Human Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5776-7964
Lindsey Haynes-MaslowDepartment of Health Policy and Management, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Sarah K BowenDepartment of Sociology and Anthropology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of the increasingly polarized U.S. political environments of the 2016 and 2020 elections, how did rural caregivers think about food and health policies? To answer this question, researchers interviewed 50 low-income women living in two rural N.C. counties in 2016/7 and 2020 as part of a broader longitudinal qualitative study of family food environments. As participants reflected on elections and food assistance policies, caregivers focused on their experiences as mothers and described current or potential policies and programs in light of how they would impact their children. Caregivers also made recommendations for universal and inclusive policies that would improve their access to food. However, their responses were also racialized, with White caregivers more likely to use tropes of "deservingness" when discussing public benefits. To improve food security in rural areas, researchers should center rural low-income women's perspectives when developing food policy, particularly given the important role mothers play in feeding their families and mitigating the impacts of food insecurity.

Indexed as

CaregiversNutrition PolicyRural PopulationAdultChildFemaleFood AssistanceFood InsecurityFood SupplyHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedMothersPoliticsPoverty

Identifiers

PMID40694544
PMCPMC12282922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.