SynthesisOccupational medicine (Oxford, England)2025
Systematic review on occupational medicine training in European medical schools.
Synthesis in Occupational medicine (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOccupational medicine (OM) plays a pivotal role in the prevention of work-related diseases, re-integration, and health promotion. However, the field faces significant challenges, including a shortage of specialists, a lack of appeal to medical graduates, and lack of visibility and support from authorities. We approached the need to enhance pre-graduate training of future doctors, which could address these challenges but is currently deemed suboptimal.
aimsThis systematic review aims to evaluate the status, trends, and future perspectives of undergraduate OM education in Europe.
methodsA systematic review was conducted using the PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect databases up to July 2024. The review includes studies on OM undergraduate training from Europe. Using the PRISMA flow diagram, from an initial finding of 589 studies, this systematic review analysed 22 studies.
resultsThe analysis showed wide variability in OM education across Europe, with a declining trend in training over time. Most studies (54%) focused on the UK, and 74% collected data from students. Common methods included e-case learning, team-based learning and workplace visits. While students' knowledge and attitudes improved, interest in OM careers remained unchanged.
conclusionsImprovements in OM education are necessary to address its precarious status. A shared framework could be a promising starting point. Effective strategies, funding, support, and investment are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.