Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40694512›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2025

Real-world Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Sinopharm COVID-19 Vaccine Against Symptomatic COVID-19 in an Omicron-Dominant Setting in Mozambique: A Test-Negative, Case-Control Study.

Igor Ubisse Capitine, Asma Binte Aziz, Alvaro Manhiça, Inês Tivane, Absalão Zumba, Milton Nhumba, Zamith Rebocho, Elias Miquicene, Neusa Nguenha, José Langa and 19 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Overcoming Vaccine Inequities and Research Gaps in Africa: Challenges and Opportunities Identified During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Igor Ubisse CapitineInstituto Nacional de Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.ORCID 0000-0003-2346-2745
Asma Binte AzizInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0203-5744
Alvaro ManhiçaInstituto Nacional de Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.
Inês TivaneSofala Provincial Delegation, Instituto Nacional de Saúde, Mozambique.
Absalão ZumbaSofala Provincial Delegation, Instituto Nacional de Saúde, Mozambique.ORCID 0009-0002-1019-5182
Milton NhumbaSofala Provincial Delegation, Instituto Nacional de Saúde, Mozambique.
Zamith RebochoSofala Provincial Delegation, Instituto Nacional de Saúde, Mozambique.ORCID 0009-0005-1716-3513
Elias MiquiceneSofala Provincial Delegation, Instituto Nacional de Saúde, Mozambique.
Neusa NguenhaSofala Provincial Delegation, Instituto Nacional de Saúde, Mozambique.
José LangaInstituto Nacional de Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.
Harshvardhan ShrivastavaInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yunkai YangChina National Biotec Group Company Limited, China.
Shiyu WangChina National Biotec Group Company Limited, China.
Ju Yeon ParkInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2148-5329
Seung Eun KyungInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young Ae YouInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0002-4703-2627
Hyoryoung LeeInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Eun Lyeong ParkInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9898-9141
Raphaël RakotozandrindrainyMadagascar Institute for Vaccine Research, University of Antananarivo, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Sue Kyoung JoInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chloe SherlikerInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jonathan D SugimotoInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1761-328X
Hyon Jin JeonInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2344-4574
Tabea BingerInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0003-6288-9693
Mohamadou SiribieInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Deok Ryun KimInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ilesh V JaniInstituto Nacional de Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.ORCID 0000-0002-6880-6655
Florian MarksInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6043-7170
Birkneh Tilahun TadesseInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4005-8605

Funding

Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations PRJ-6447
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe evaluated the effectiveness of the Sinopharm coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine, introduced in Mozambique, against the Omicron variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), prevalent from March 2022 to December 2023.

methodsA test-negative case-control study was nested in a community-based enhanced COVID-19 surveillance in seven healthcare facilities including mobile testing stations in the Dondo District, Mozambique, between March 2022 and December 2023. Participants were individuals aged ≥2 years with COVID-19-like symptoms for <10 days. Cases were those with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed COVID-19. For each case, three PCR test-negative controls were matched, according to age (±5 years), sex, and date of PCR test (±7 days). Follow-up for all cases was conducted until disease resolution. Vaccine protection was assessed according to the association between complete vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 disease onset ≥14 days after vaccination.

resultsThe study did not reach the targeted sample size, and only a third were analyzed. A total of 253 cases were matched to 759 test-negative controls by age, sex, and testing date, a process known as matching. Among cases, 41% had one dose of Sinopharm, 53% had two doses, and 6% were unvaccinated. Among the test-negative controls, 37% had 1 dose, 57% had two doses, and 7% were unvaccinated. The adjusted vaccine effectiveness, calculated using matching and adjusted for age and PCR test date, was 18.0% (95% confidence interval, -85.3 to 63.7; P = .63). No COVID-19-positive participants required hospitalization.

conclusionsIn an Omicron-dominant setting, two doses of the Sinopharm vaccine did not show significant protection against symptomatic COVID-19. However, as our analysis was based on data from only a third of enrolled individuals with confirmed vaccination status, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Our results underscore the importance of real-time vaccine effectiveness evaluations to inform optimal rollout strategies in low- and middle-income countries.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesSARS-CoV-2Vaccine EfficacyAdolescentAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMozambiqueYoung AdultCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19 vaccinationeffectivenessMozambiqueSinopharmtest-negative design (TND)

Identifiers

PMID40694512
PMCPMC12282512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.