ArticleJournal of sex research2026
Association Between Negative Pregnancy Desires and Recent Condomless Sex Among Couples in Vietnam.
Article in Journal of sex research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We examined the association between negative pregnancy desires and women's semen exposure, a measure of recent condomless sex, among 500 different-sex couples using condoms for contraception. We analyzed data from a trial in Thanh Hoa, Vietnam which longitudinally assessed women's semen exposure via prostate-specific antigen in vaginal fluid. At enrollment, partners independently reported the importance of avoiding pregnancy for the next six months. Assessing negative pregnancy desires as strong-negative (very important) versus not strong-negative (important/neutral), we evaluated partner concordance of desires and compared this against semen exposure using log-binomial generalized estimating equations. While 59% of men and 58% of women reported strong-negative pregnancy desires, 45% of couples had partner-concordant strong-negative desires. Couples with partner-concordant strong-negative desires had reduced risk of semen exposure (aRR 0.58, 95% CI [0.34, 0.99]) compared to couples without strong-negative desires. Similarly, couples where only one partner had a strong-negative desire had lower semen exposure than couples without strong-negative desires (aRR 0.60, 95% CI [0.38, 0.95]). Couples were less likely to engage in condomless sex when either partner had strong desires to prevent pregnancy, regardless of the gender of the partner with strong-negative desires. This highlights the importance of considering both partners' desires in contraceptive counseling to prevent condomless sex and unintended pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.