ArticleMicrobiology (Reading, England)2025
Improved efficiency of two-step amplicon PCR using an acoustic liquid handler.
Article in Microbiology (Reading, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Engineering Potential in Undomesticated Microbes With VECTOR.Microbial biotechnology · 2025Article
- Culturomics from field-grown crop plants using dilution to extinction, two-step library preparation and amplicon sequencing.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The improvement in next-generation sequencing technologies has reduced the costs of sequencing significantly. However, library preparation costs for amplicon sequencing have remained largely unchanged - which is ultimately the cost-limiting step in processing large numbers of microbiome samples. Acoustic liquid handlers can transfer volumes as low as 2.5 nl and have been used to miniaturize several different molecular and cellular assays, including single-step PCR amplicon library preparations. However, there are no current methods available for a two-step library preparation process using an acoustic liquid handler. In this study, we tested the efficiency of an acoustic liquid handler to automate the PCRs and library quantification while also incorporating automated library bead cleanup. We compared the material usage and costs for library preparation and sequencing results of this automated method to the standard, manual method. The automated protocol was able to reduce both PCR reaction volumes fivefold and increased efficiency for library preparation by ~32% without affecting bacterial community compositions. The associated increase in the efficiency of our automated method will allow for greater throughput in sequencing hundreds of microbiome samples without affecting the quality of those sequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.