ArticleJournal of biomechanical engineering2025
An Image-Based Computational Framework to Evaluate the Material Stiffness of Arterial Tissue With High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Article in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Atherosclerotic plaque rupture is the precipitating event in most acute coronary syndromes. As rupture results from the material failure of arterial tissue under mechanical loading, in vivo image-based techniques that can accurately characterize arterial material stiffness offer potential in risk-stratifying lesions. This study developed and validated a novel magnetic resonance (MR) image-based computational framework to evaluate the material stiffness of vascular tissue. Porcine carotid arteries (n = 4) were subjected to biaxial mechanical testing, followed by MR image acquisition under controlled loading. Best-fit material parameters for an anisotropic material model were estimated via regression analysis on the biaxial data. A deformable image registration technique, termed hyperelastic warping, was utilized to derive strain fields from the MR images and integrated with an inverse parameter estimation algorithm to identify the parameters for the same constitutive model. Experimentally and warping-estimated material stiffness values (tangent moduli) were not significantly different at physiologic lumen pressures of 80 (0.36 ± 0.15 and 0.48 ± 0.20 MPa; p = 0.14) and 120 mmHg (0.64 ± 0.27 and 0.73 ± 0.36 MPa; p = 0.60). The warping-directed inverse modeling framework identified subtle, but observable variations in material stiffness within a sample and accurately illustrated the physical influence of loading conditions on those properties. Collectively, these results demonstrated the robustness of an innovative approach to characterize nonlinear, hyperelastic behaviors of arterial tissue and quantify material stiffness directly from image data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.