Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40694370›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2025

The Effects of Forest Harvesting on Total and Methylmercury Concentrations in Surface Waters Depend on Harvest Practices and Physical Site Characteristics.

Karin Eklöf, Heleen de Wit, Chris S Eckley, Collin A Eagles-Smith, Susan L Eggert, Robert W Mackereth, Ulf Skyllberg, Liisa Ukonmaanaho, Matti Verta, Craig Allan and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Karin EklöfDepartment of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala SE-75007, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7462-7824
Heleen de WitNorwegian Institute for Water Research, Økernveien 94, Oslo 0579, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5646-5390
Chris S EckleyUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6986-4451
Collin A Eagles-SmithForest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, United States Geological Survey, 3200 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1329-5285
Susan L EggertUnited States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Grand Rapids, Minnesota 55744, United States.
Robert W MackerethCentre for Northern Forest Ecosystem Research, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, 421 James St S., Thunder Bay,Ontario, P7E 2 V6, Canada.
Ulf SkyllbergDepartment of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå SE-90183, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6939-8799
Liisa UkonmaanahoNatural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE), Latokartanonkaari 9, Helsinki 00790, Finland.
Matti VertaFinnish Environment Institute (Syke), Latokartanonkaari 11, Helsinki 00790, Finland.
Craig AllanDepartment of Earth, Environmental and Geographical Sciences, University of North Carolina Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina 28223, United States.
Erik J S EmilsonNatural Resources Canada, Great Lakes Forestry Centre, 1219 Queen St. E, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6A2E3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1516-9728
Karen A KiddDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S4K1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5619-1358
Carl P J MitchellDepartment of Physical and Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario MIC1A4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8538-5138
John MuntheIVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, P.O. Box 530 21, Göteborg SE-40014, Sweden.
Tapani SallantausFinnish Environment Institute (Syke), Latokartanonkaari 11, Helsinki 00790, Finland.
Joel SegerstenDepartment of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala SE-75007, Sweden.
Andrea G BravoDepartament de Biologia Marina i Oceanografia, Institut de Ciències del Mar, ICM-CSIC, Barcelona, Catalunya 08003, Spain.
Randall K KolkaUnited States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Grand Rapids, Minnesota 55744, United States.
Colin P R McCarterDepartment of Biology, Chemistry, and Geography, Nipissing University, North Bay, Ontario P1B8L7, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7308-0369
Petri PorvariNatural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE), Latokartanonkaari 9, Helsinki 00790, Finland.
Eva RingThe Forestry Research Institute of Sweden, Skogforsk, Uppsala Science Park, Uppsala SE-75183, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8962-9811
Stephen D SebestyenUnited States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Grand Rapids, Minnesota 55744, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6315-0108
Ulf SikströmThe Forestry Research Institute of Sweden, Skogforsk, Uppsala Science Park, Uppsala SE-75183, Sweden.
Therese Sahlén ZetterbergDepartment of Soil and Environment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala SE-75007, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forest harvesting can lead to mercury (Hg) mobilization from soils to aquatic habitats and promote the transformation of inorganic Hg to highly neurotoxic and bioaccumulative methyl-Hg (MeHg). Multiple past studies reveal broad variation of stream water MeHg and total Hg (THg) concentration responses to forest harvesting, which has confounded messaging to forest and resource managers. To advance beyond divergent and sometimes contradictory findings, we synthesized information for 23 previously studied catchments in North America and Fennoscandia and compiled a uniform set of soil, landscape, and harvesting properties to identify forest management, riparian, and hillslope factors that influence responses of stream water MeHg and THg concentrations. From this synthesis, we found catchments with high soil moisture and organic soil layers >100 cm to be at highest risk for disturbance-induced increases in MeHg formation after harvest but not necessarily affecting concentrations of MeHg in stream waters. Instead, the combination of MeHg formation in soils along with factors that affect mobilization with runoff to streams most influenced how forest harvest affects MeHg concentrations in stream waters.

Indexed as

ForestryForestsMethylmercury CompoundsEnvironmental MonitoringMercuryRiversSoilWater Pollutants, ChemicalMercuryMethylmercury CompoundsSoilWater Pollutants, Chemicalclear-cutforestrymethylmercurymitigation methodssoil disturbance

Identifiers

PMID40694370
PMCPMC12329714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.