ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2025
Factors influencing the occurrence and characteristics of white matter hyperintensities on the brain imaging of migraine patients.
Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lacosamide Versus Propranolol in Episodic Migraine, a Randomized Controlled Double-blinded Trial.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Trial
- Lacosamide versus topiramate in episodic migraine: a randomized controlled double-blinded trial.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhite matter hyperintensities (WMHs) increase the burden of migraine on the patients' lives and leading to migraine-related poor outcomes, so we aim to evaluate the association of different neurophysiological, psychological, and clinical factors with the presence and characteristics of WMHs on the brain imaging of migraine patients.
methodsOur study included 300 migraine patients who underwent clinical, psychological, and neurophysiological assessment, including P300, which represented an event-related potential (ERP) component elicited in the decision-making process. The goal was to evaluate the association of these factors with the presence and characteristics of WMHs on the brain imaging of migraine patients.
resultsolder age (OR, 1.213; 95% CI, 1.149 to 1.787; P-value 0.02), P300 Fz latency (OR, 1.852; 95% CI, 1.374 to 2.314; P-value < 0.001), P300 Pz latency (OR, 1.823; 95% CI, 1.397 to 4.237; P-value < 0.001), migraine with aura (OR, 7.115; 95% CI, 3.874 to 14.254; P-value 0.01), chronic migraine (OR, 6.105; 95% CI, 3.364 to 8.057; P-value < 0.001), and Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) (OR, 0.543; 95% CI, 0.169 to 0.723; P-value < 0.001) were associated with developing WMHs on the brain MRI of migraine patients.
conclusionProlonged P300 latency, older age, lower MoCA score, chronic migraine, and migraine with aura were associated with the presence of WMHs on the brain imaging of migraine patients. In addition, longer P300 latency was positively correlated with WMH diameter, number, and Schelten's score. In contrast, higher P300 amplitude and higher MoCA score were negatively correlated with WMH diameter, number, and Schelten's score in migraine patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40694274What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.