ArticleOdontology2026
Evaluation of nisin-added adhesive resins: antimicrobial properties, dentin bond strength, degree of monomer conversion and structural/chemical characterization.
Article in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluated the antibacterial effect, dentin bond strength, monomer conversion degree, and chemical structure of an adhesive resin containing nisin, an antimicrobial peptide (AMP) derived from Lactococcus lactis. Antimicrobial activity against S. mutans was tested using a disk diffusion method with various nisin concentrations (1:1 to 1:80). The optimum concentration, 1:40, was selected for further testing. The adhesive was characterized using XRD, EDX, FT-IR, and SEM analyses. For bond strength testing, 80 caries-free molars with enamel removed were divided into control and AMP groups, each further subdivided into etch-and-rinse or self-etch application subgroups (n = 20). FT-IR was used to measure monomer conversion degrees, and data were statistically analyzed. Antimicrobial testing showed inhibition zones of 27 mm for nisin alone, 9 mm for resin, and 12 mm for resin with 1:40 nisin. SEM and EDX analyses confirmed homogeneous nisin distribution, while XRD indicated no structural changes to the adhesive. In the etch-and-rinse mode, the AMP group exhibited higher bond strength compared to the Control group though the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.5). Similarly, no significant differences were observed between the groups in the self-etch mode (p > 0.5). When comparing the bond strengths of adhesive resins according to the application protocol, no significant differences were found between the etch-and-rinse and self-etch modes for either adhesive (p > 0.5). The experimental adhesive exhibited a lower monomer conversion degree than the control group (p < 0.05). The nisin-containing experimental adhesive showed antimicrobial activity against S. mutans, preserved bond strength in etch-and-rinse and self-etch mode, and maintained its structural integrity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40694265What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.