ArticleOral radiology2026
Area detection improves the person-based performance of a deep learning system for classifying the presence of carotid artery calcifications on panoramic radiographs.
Article in Oral radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence-assisted Diagnosis of Carotid Artery Calcifications on Panoramic Radiographs: A Meta-analysis.International dental journal · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic Performance of Deep Learning and Radiomics in Extracranial Carotid Plaque Detection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Side- and patient-based performance of a deep learning system based on the results of individual detection of carotid artery calcifications on panoramic radiographs.Imaging science in dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study investigated deep learning (DL) systems for diagnosing carotid artery calcifications (CAC) on panoramic radiographs. To this end, two DL systems, one with preceding and one with simultaneous area detection functions, were developed to classify CAC on panoramic radiographs, and their person-based classification performances were compared with that of a DL model directly created using entire panoramic radiographs.
methodsA total of 580 panoramic radiographs from 290 patients (with CAC) and 290 controls (without CAC) were used to create and evaluate the DL systems. Two convolutional neural networks, GoogLeNet and YOLOv7, were utilized. The following three systems were created: (1) direct classification of entire panoramic images (System 1), (2) preceding region-of-interest (ROI) detection followed by classification (System 2), and (3) simultaneous ROI detection and classification (System 3). Person-based evaluation using the same test data was performed to compare the three systems. A side-based (left and right sides of participants) evaluation was also performed on Systems 2 and 3. Between-system differences in area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) were assessed using DeLong's test.
resultsFor the side-based evaluation, the AUCs of Systems 2 and 3 were 0.89 and 0.84, respectively, and in the person-based evaluation, Systems 2 and 3 had significantly higher AUC values of 0.86 and 0.90, respectively, compared with System 1 (P < 0.001). No significant difference was found between Systems 2 and 3.
conclusionsPreceding or simultaneous use of area detection improved the person-based performance of DL for classifying the presence of CAC on panoramic radiographs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40694246What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.