ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2025
Regional disparities in the care and outcomes of atrial fibrillation patients in a universal health care system: a population-based cohort study.
Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWhile prior studies have shown regional disparities in patients with myocardial infarction and heart failure within a universal health care, there are limited data on the association between different regions within a universal health care system and outcomes after an atrial fibrillation (AF) diagnosis. In this context, we aimed to assess variations in processes of care and outcomes among patients with the diagnosis of AF presenting to the emergency department (ED).
methodsWe conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of all adult patients (≥ 18 years) with their first presentation to the ED with AF between April 1, 2012, and March 31, 2022 in Ontario, Canada. We divided the analyses into five major Ontario Health Regions (North, East, Central, Toronto, and West). North was used as the reference group. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality or admission. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, all-cause admission, and all-cause ED visit. We examined outcomes up to 1 year from index AF diagnosis. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to study the association of different regions and outcomes.
resultsAmong 104,383 patients with the diagnosis of AF in the ED (mean age 69.4 years, 47.1% female), there were significant differences between Ontario Health Regions in physician follow-up (less access to primary care in North or a cardiologist in West) and procedures performed (less cardioversions or ablations performed in North). There was a significantly lower rate of the primary outcome of all-cause mortality or admission in Ontario Health Regions compared to the North (East HR 0.87 (0.83, 0.90), Central HR 0.87 (0.83, 0.91), Toronto HR 0.88 (0.84, 0.92), and West HR 0.87 (0.84, 0.91)). Similar findings were noted with lower all-cause admission and all-cause ED visit in Ontario Health Regions compared to the North, but all-cause mortality did not differ between regions.
conclusionsDespite universal health care and prescription medication coverage, regional variations exist in the management of AF patients. Patients in Northern Ontario were less likely to visit a primary care physician and had worse outcomes driven by higher admission rate after AF diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40694241What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.