Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40694240›Full record

Observational studyJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2026

Remote monitoring of leadless pacemakers using a novel conductive telemetry communication method.

Sri Sundaram, Nitika Chellappa, Kunal Chaniary, Monica Lo, Devi Nair, Rajesh Banker

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06542133 (AVEIR Remote Care System Data Collection Non-Significant Risk Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06542133 completednot on this map

AVEIR Remote Care System Data Collection Non-Significant Risk Study

TypeobservationalSponsorAbbott Medical DevicesRan2024 to 2024Enrolled32ConditionsCardiac Pacemaker, Cardiac Rhythm Disorder, BradycardiaArmsAVEIR remote care system
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sri SundaramSouth Denver Cardiology Associates, 1000 SouthPark Drive, Littleton, CO, 80111, USA. sris@southdenver.com.
Nitika ChellappaAbbott Laboratories, 15900 Valley View Ct, Sylmar, CA, 91342, USA.
Kunal ChaniaryAbbott Laboratories, 15900 Valley View Ct, Sylmar, CA, 91342, USA.
Monica LoArkansas Heart Hospital, 1701 South Shackleford Road, Little Rock, AR, 72211, USA.
Devi NairBernards Medical Center, 225 East Washington Avenue, Jonesboro, AR, USA.
Rajesh BankerHoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, 1 Hoag Drive, Newport Beach, CA, 92663, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRemote care has become part of the standard of care for cardiac rhythm device management. The Aveir™ single-chamber (AR and VR) and dual-chamber (DR) leadless pacemaker (LP) systems (Abbott, Abbott Park, IL) utilize a novel conductive telemetry communication schema for device interrogation and programming. A patient transmitter is designed as an at-home remote monitoring solution that interrogates the Aveir leadless pacemaker system via conductive telemetry and transmits the patient data.

objectiveTo characterize the performance of a remote care system that interrogates implanted Aveir LP systems via conductive telemetry.

methodsPatients implanted with an Aveir DR, VR, or AR system were enrolled in a data collection study upon hospital IRB approval of the study. The study protocol included (1) in-clinic interrogation of the LP system using the patient transmitter in a controlled setting, in two modes of use (hand-held and wired modes); and (2) optional at-home interrogation using the patient transmitter.

resultsThirty-one (25 males/6 females) subjects in three centers completed in-clinic interrogation of their Aveir system using the patient transmitter in both modes of use. Eighteen subjects completed at-home interrogation. Transmitter performance was comparable between modes of use, and between in-clinic and at-home interrogation. In all subjects 31/31 (100%), end-to-end remote care system use was successful.

conclusionThe initial, real-world experience of utilizing an end-to-end remote care system with Aveir LP patients demonstrated feasibility of this technology to offer an at-home remote monitoring solution for leadless pacemaker patients via conductive telemetry (Funded by Abbott Laboratories; Clinical Trials.gov ID:NCT06542133).

Indexed as

Pacemaker, ArtificialTelemetryAgedEquipment DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleRemote Patient MonitoringBradycardiaLeadless pacemakersRemote monitoring

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.