ArticleCognitive processing2025
Does injury proneness aid or impair navigation ability? A study on self-reported errors, risk and evaluation behaviors in relation to sense of direction.
Article in Cognitive processing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sense of direction, a self-reported navigation ability, is essential in daily life for efficient navigation. Research has shown that individual difference factors may contribute to variability in this aspect, with accident proneness being one of them. The main aim of the current study was to examine whether proneness to injury-related behavior, with its different facets, is related to self-reported navigation ability. A total of 412 participants, from 20 to 86 years of age (215 women), filled a questionnaire on sense of direction and another on injury-related behavior, assessing propensity for errors behaviors, risky behaviors and dangers evaluation. Fluid reasoning and Mental rotations tasks were also completed. The results of regression models showed that significant predictors of self-reported navigation scores were gender (men having higher ratings), age (older age was associated with higher ratings), injury-related behavior in terms of errors (a higher score in error was associated with lower ratings) and risk (a higher score of risky behaviors is associated with greater ratings). Overall, the study shows that self-reported navigation ability is positively related with risk proneness and negatively with error proneness, offering fresh evidence for a deeper understanding of variability in people's sense of direction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40694214What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.