ArticleInflammopharmacology2025
Macroscopic and microscopic evaluation of the therapeutic effects of fosfomycin on surgical wound healing in a rat model.
Article in Inflammopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- BifunctionalGels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the therapeutic potential of fosfomycin on surgical wound healing in a sterile rat model, emphasizing its immunomodulatory and regenerative effects beyond antimicrobial activity. Thirty male Sprague Dawley rats were randomly assigned to five groups: negative control, positive control (dexamethasone 1 mg/kg), and three fosfomycin-treated groups (75, 150, and 300 mg/kg, intraperitoneally). A standardized full-thickness dorsal wound was surgically induced, and treatments were administered over a 14-day period. Macroscopic healing was assessed using a validated Wound Healing Score (WHS) on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, and 14. Histological analyses using H&E and Masson's trichrome staining were performed on days 7 and 14. Additionally, ELISA was used to quantify pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10) and VEGF levels, while western blotting assessed the expression of NF-κB, p-NF-κB, NLRP3, and caspase-3 proteins. Fosfomycin at 150 mg/kg significantly accelerated wound closure, enhanced collagen deposition, improved re-epithelialization, and increased neovascularization compared to control groups. ELISA results showed reduced TNF-α and IL-6 levels and elevated IL-10 and VEGF levels, indicating an anti-inflammatory and a pro-angiogenic profile. Western blot analyses confirmed the downregulation of NF-κB, p-NF-κB, caspase-3, and NLRP3, suggesting suppressed inflammatory signaling and apoptosis. These results support the hypothesis that fosfomycin facilitates wound healing through modulation of immune responses and tissue regeneration pathways. 150 mg/kg dose emerged as the most effective, highlighting a potential therapeutic window. Collectively, the findings suggest that fosfomycin may serve as a dual-function agent in surgical wound care, warranting further investigations in clinical and infected wound models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40694205What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.