Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40694190›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2025

Changes in HER2low and HER2-ultralow status in 47 advanced breast carcinoma core biopsies, matching surgical specimens, and their distant metastases assessed by conventional light microscopy, digital pathology, and artificial intelligence.

Anikó Kovács, Leif Klint, Barbro Linderholm, Toshima Z Parris

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anikó Kovács *Department of Clinical Pathology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Leif Klint *Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, SE-413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden. leif.klint@vgregion.se.
Barbro LinderholmDepartment of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, SE-413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Toshima Z ParrisDepartment of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, SE-413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHER2-targeted therapies have improved survival in HER2-positive breast cancer, and recent data suggest potential benefits for patients with HER2-low tumors (defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1 + or 2 + and, in situ hybridization (ISH)-negative). HER2-low tumors are heterogenous, spanning the hormone receptor-positive and triple-negative subtypes. Assessing HER2-low and HER2-ultralow status remains challenging, especially across specimen types.

aimsThis study aims to (1) compare HER2 assessment using conventional microscopy, digital pathology, and an artificial intelligence (AI) model, and (2) investigate changes in HER2-low status between core biopsies, surgical specimens, and metastases. MATERIALS AND

methodsIHC slides from 47 HER2-low advanced breast carcinomas were analyzed using conventional microscopy, digital pathology, and an AI model developed on Aiforia® Create. HER2 statuses were categorized as low, ultralow (score 1 + in 1-10%), and null (score 0 or 1 + in < 1% with difficult-to-interpret minimal membranous-like staining). Changes in HER2 expression across specimen types were evaluated using agreement measures and visualization tools.

resultsThe AI model identified more HER2-low and HER2-ultralow cases compared to conventional methods, improving detection accuracy. HER2 expression differed between specimen types, with metastases exhibiting increased HER2 expression compared to surgical specimens and core biopsies. Digital pathology also showed stronger membranous staining and identified more HER2 expressor tumor cells with any kind of membranous staining than microscopy.

conclusionsAI evaluation is a more sensitive method for HER2-low assessment and reveals expression changes across disease progression. These findings emphasize the need for standardized HER2 assessment to ensure accurate therapy eligibility, particularly for novel treatments like Trastuzumab-Deruxtecan.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesAdultAgedArtificial IntelligenceBiomarkers, TumorBiopsy, Large-Core NeedleFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMicroscopyMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesArtificial IntelligenceChanges in HER2-Low statusHER2-Low breast cancerHER2-Null breast cancerHER2-Ultralow breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID40694190
PMCPMC12396990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.