ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Experience Matters: An Application of the Operative Value Index for Lumbar Fusions.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAs healthcare systems transition to value-based care models, it is critical to understand factors influencing costs and outcomes in neurosurgery. This study utilizes Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing (TDABC) to assess the impact of surgeon experience and case volume on costs, clinical outcomes, and operative value in lumbar fusions. While TDABC has been applied in various surgical specialties, its use in neurosurgery, particularly in analyzing surgeon-specific factors, remains limited.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single center, analyzing lumbar instrumented arthrodesis procedures from 2017 to 2019. Primary variables included surgeon experience (years) and case volume (annual procedures). Confounding variables such as patient demographics, comorbidities, surgery type, and levels fused were considered. Intraoperative cost data were sourced from electronic medical records and departmental sources. Clinical outcomes were measured using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and operative value was defined by the Operative Value Index (OVI), defined as the percent improvement in ODI per $1000 spent intraoperatively. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) examined the relationships between surgical costs, surgeon experience, case volume, and clinical outcomes.
resultsAmong 291 surgeries, surgeons with ≥ 15 years of experience had lower mean surgery costs ($16,071.78 vs. $22,259.71, p < 0.001) and higher OVI scores (1.81 vs. 1.2, p = 0.033) compared to less experienced surgeons. High-volume surgeons (≥ 100 annual cases) showed greater ODI improvements (34.90 vs. 22.07, p = 0.022) and higher OVI scores (2.22 vs. 1.01, p = 0.016) compared to lower-volume surgeons. Procedure type and levels fused significantly influenced surgery costs (p < 0.001) and OVI (p < 0.001).
conclusionsThis study is among the first to apply TDABC in evaluating the impact of surgeon experience and case volume on costs and outcomes in lumbar fusion procedures. Findings suggest that surgeons with ≥ 15 years of experience and high case volumes (≥ 100 annual cases) enhance operative value by reducing costs and improving ODI, respectively. Encouraging specialization and maintaining high case volumes may enhance cost-effectiveness and patient outcomes in healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.