Trial reportMedical microbiology and immunology2025
Short- and long-term impact of aseptic bathing strategies on the skin microbiome in ICU patients.
Trial report in Medical microbiology and immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bathing strategies with antiseptic agents, such as Chlorhexidine and Octenidine, have been widely adopted to mitigate infection risks in intensive care units (ICU). However, concerns exist regarding their long-term effects on skin microbiome structures and potential unintended consequences, including antibiotic cross-resistance. This longitudinal study characterized the compositional changes of the skin microbiome of ICU patients upon these two antiseptic bathing strategies when compared to standard water and soap bathing. Samples were collected in a three-armed cluster randomized decolonization trial (registration number DRKS00010475). Skin swabs from 5 different sites and three time points were analyzed by culture-based methods, 16S rRNA-gene amplicon sequencing and multiplex Taq-Man assays for detection of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARG). Our results show that Chlorhexidine bathing led to a sustained reduction of the bacterial biomass on different skin sites, as measured by both molecular and culture-based methods. Thereby, the microbial structures remained largely unaltered both in their diversity and their taxonomic composition. However, the loss of microbiome site-specificity observed on the skin of ICU patients remained unchanged independently from the bathing strategy applied and persisted even after discharge. None of the antiseptic bathing strategies led to an increase or accumulation of antibiotic-resistance determinants on any of the skin sites investigated in this study. Thus, this study suggests that daily patient bathing with 2% Chlorhexidine impregnated cloths or 0.08% Octenidine wash mitts does not impact skin microbiome structures and antibiotic resistance gene accumulation in ICU patients when compared to non-antiseptic water and soap bathing routine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.