Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40694137›Full record

Trial reportPsychological research2025

How does vertical reading affect saccade programming and lexical processing in the Roman script?

Zeynep G Özkan, Jukka Hyönä, Maria Fernández-López, Manuel Perea

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zeynep G ÖzkanDepartamento de Metodología and ERI‑Lectura, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8684-5789
Jukka HyönäDepartment of Psychology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5950-3361
Maria Fernández-LópezDepartament de Psicologia Bàsica and ERI-Lectura, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7419-7369
Manuel PereaDepartamento de Metodología and ERI‑Lectura, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain. mperea@uv.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3291-1365

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although computational models of eye movement control in reading have focused on horizontal text layouts, vertically oriented text is also encountered in daily life in the Roman script. To examine the interplay between saccade programming and lexical processing under vertical reading in the Roman script, we manipulated (1) the layout of words in a sentence (horizontal vs. vertical) and (2) word frequency (high vs. low). In the vertical layout, the words themselves remained in standard orientation but were arranged vertically (one below the other). Eye-movement measures at the sentence level (e.g., total reading time, number of fixations) showed a cost for the vertical arrangement, primarily reflected in longer fixation durations rather than a greater number of fixations. Critically, at the target-word level, the word-frequency effect -which increased in later eye-fixation measures (gaze duration, total time)- remained similar in size across both layouts. The additive pattern of word frequency and text layout, supported by Bayes factors, suggests that slower saccade programming in the vertical format does not substantially impact lexical processing. While lexical processing can influence saccade programming, delays in saccade programming do not, in turn, alter lexical processing-a pattern that constrains current models of eye movement control in reading.

Indexed as

LanguagePattern Recognition, VisualReadingSaccadesEye Movement MeasurementsFemaleFixation, OcularHumansMalePsycholinguisticsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40694137
PMCPMC12283434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.