ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2025
The tall order of stature estimation in burnt skeletal remains: a performance test in the Portuguese population.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Thermal alteration of skeletal remains in forensic anthropology: a systematic review.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluates the performance of two stature estimation methods developed for unburnt bones - Cordeiro et al. (2009) and Mendonça (2000) - here applied to bones submitted to heat exposure. The skeletal remains of twelve individuals were experimentally burnt in an electric muffle at maximum temperatures ranging from 413ºC to 900ºC. Stature estimations were calculated before and after burning using the humerus, the femur, the first metatarsal, and the second metatarsal. Results showed that the bones burnt below 700ºC experienced minimal shrinkage (1.32 ± 0.62%), therefore resulting in post-burning interval estimates consistent with pre-burning estimates. Conversely, bones burnt at 700ºC or higher displayed accentuated shrinkage (9.57 ± 0.69%), thus affecting the performance of both methods. Heat-induced changes to the humerus and the femur frequently hindered the application of the method of Mendonça (2000), suggesting Cordeiro et al. (2009) to be more viable for burnt remains contexts. Adding a 10% shrinkage correction factor to the measurements improved the accuracy of the stature estimates, fitting the pre-burning estimates within the post-burning intervals. A 12% correction factor was also tested but it tended to overestimate the post-burning intervals. Although the method of Cordeiro et al. (2009) demonstrated a good performance when applied to burnt remains, these findings emphasize the impact of heat-induced changes on stature estimation and the necessity of specific (or adjusted) approaches for calcined bones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.