ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2025
Dosimetry and kinetic modelling of [
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03270579 (An Open-Label Study to Investigate the Regional Brain Kinetics of the Positron Emission Tomography Ligand [18F]JNJ-64511070), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Open-Label Study to Investigate the Regional Brain Kinetics of the Positron Emission Tomography Ligand [18F]JNJ-64511070
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Preclinical Evaluation of [Molecular imaging and biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptors (AMPA-R) are the primary determinants of synaptic strength in most glutamatergic neurons. Inhibition or negative modulation of AMPA-Rs is an attractive strategy for therapeutic intervention in central nervous system (CNS) disorders characterized by excessive neuronal activity. We report the clinical qualification of a AMPA-R associated TARP-γ8 specific PET ligand [
methodsWhole body dosimetry was performed in 3 healthy male subjects (22-41y). Upon estimation of the normalized cumulated activity (NCA), the effective dose (ED) was calculated using OLINDA v1.1. In a second part, 120-minute dynamic brain scanning with arterial blood sampling was done in five healthy males (25-53y) to determine the appropriate kinetic model and evaluate time stability of total distribution volume (V
resultsThe average ED (± SD) was 15.6 ± 1.0 µSv/MBq. Brain uptake of [
conclusion[
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov database with clinical trial number NCT03270579, Registered 31 August 2017.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40694102What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.