ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2025
The visual quality of patients with myopia and presbyopia after ICL V4c implantation and FS-LASIK using monovision design.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comparative study on the influence of age-specific ocular anatomical differences on the prediction of post-ICL surgery vault.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Visual and accommodative outcomes after femtosecond LASIK with and without monovision in patients over 40 years.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLong-term visual quality of myopes with presbyopia was investigated after implantable collamer lens (ICL) V4c implantation and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) surgery using a monovision design.
methodsFifty-eight patients (116 eyes) were enrolled and average final follow-up time was 55.38 ± 19.38 months. Routine ocular examinations (manifest refraction, axial length, and anterior segment biological parameters), were performed before and after the surgeries. Patients' objective visual quality was evaluated using contrast sensitivity (CS) parameters and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), while subjective visual quality was assessed using a questionnaire.
resultsICL and FS-LASIK were successfully performed without complications in all subjects. Binocular visual acuity at near and middle distances remained unchanged; however, at far distances (0.05 ± 0.11 in the ICL group and 0.10 ± 0.23 in the FS-LASIK group, P = 0.02) difference was observed. The CS of dominant eyes were 8.57 ± 2.27 and 7.45 ± 2.68 in the ICL V4c and FS-LASIK groups, respectively (P = 0.550). Moreover, SNR was 5.41 ± 2.10 in the ICL V4c group and 8.00 ± 2.43 in the FS-LASIK group (P < 0.001). CS and visual acuity of the non-dominant eye showed positive correlations at near (B = 3.29, P = 0.037) and far distances (B = 6.649, P = 0.001); however, at moderate distances (B=-3.909, P = 0.023) a negative correlation occurred.
conclusionsBoth ICL V4c and FS-LASIK provided long-term safety and efficacy for binocular vision in patients with myopia and presbyopia. Correlation between the CS and visual quality of non-dominant eyes at different distances was observed. KEY MESSAGES: What is known Monovision design for refractive surgeries can effectively correct the refractiveerrors of myopia patients with presbyopia. Binocular imbalance exists in patients after refractive surgery. What is new The visual acuity of the non-dominant eyes at different distances was the mainfactor influencing binocular balance. Correlation between the contrast sensitivity and visual quality of non-dominanteyes at different distances was observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40694076What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.