Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40694071›Full record

ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2026

[Postextubation dysphagia : Challenges regarding interdisciplinary collaboration in intensive care units].

Lena Glißmann, Katrin Bangert-Tobies

Abstract readReviewCase ReportsEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lena GlißmannKlinik für Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20251, Hamburg, Deutschland. l.glissmann@uke.de.
Katrin Bangert-TobiesKlinik für Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20251, Hamburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostextubation dysphagia (PED) represents a significant morbidity and mortality factor even in nonneurological intensive care units (ICU), potentially prolonging both ICU and overall hospital stays.

methodsA literature review was conducted to access the relevance, diagnostic approaches, and therapeutic options for PED, which were then placed in context using a clinical case study.

resultsAlthough evidence-based guidelines for PED are lacking in the literature, several articles and recommendations addressing multiprofessional treatment strategies were identified. In addition to the necessity of systematic dysphagia screening and early therapeutic interventions, particular attention should be paid to predictors that can be identified early-for example, through the use of checklists-and addressed by a multiprofessional care team.

conclusionInterdisciplinary collaboration is essential for the effective diagnosis and management of PED with the potential to improve both clinical outcomes and quality of life in affected patients. In particular, early screening, daily activation of orofacial functions within nursing care, targeted swallowing therapy, mobilization, respiratory therapy and device-supported respiratory therapy may contribute to improved patient trajectories following extubation.

Indexed as

Airway ExtubationDeglutition DisordersIntensive Care UnitsInterdisciplinary CommunicationIntersectoral CollaborationPatient Care TeamChecklistHumansDeglutition disorder managementDysphagia screeningIntensive care unit dysphagiaProlonged weaningSwallowing disorders

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.