Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40694048›Full record

Trial reportCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2025

Predictors of Cessation Readiness among Cigarette Smokers Presenting for Low-Dose CT Lung Cancer Screening in Community Settings (WF-20817CD).

Emily V Dressler, Kathryn E Weaver, Erin L Sutfin, Christina Bellinger, David P Miller, Derek Falk, W Jeffrey Petty, John Spangler, Rebecca Stone, Carol Kittel and 5 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Emily V DresslerDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-6054-7839
Kathryn E WeaverDepartment of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-9006-4064
Erin L SutfinDepartment of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-2660-8383
Christina BellingerDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy, and Immunologic Diseases, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-6648-8251
David P MillerDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-7879-4427
Derek FalkThe University of Texas at Arlington, School of Social Work, Arlington, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-5929-8874
W Jeffrey PettyDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-1553-1838
John SpanglerDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-7949-7050
Rebecca StoneDepartment of Implementation Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-3527-5237
Carol KittelDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-4512-0634
Glenn J LesserDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.ORCID 0009-0003-5471-8907
Caroline ChilesDepartment of Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-4884-2103
Jennifer A LewisCenter for Clinical Quality and Implementation Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.ORCID 0000-0002-4234-1765
Kristie Long FoleyDepartment of Implementation Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-3759-4581
OaSiS Study Team

Funding

Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment Research ProgramP30CA068485 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Ben Ho Park · 1995 to 2026
$172.8M
Wake Forest NCORP Research BaseUG1CA189824 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Emily Van Meter Dressler, GLENN J LESSER · 2014 to 2026
$57.9M
iDAPT: Implementation and Informatics - Developing Adaptable Processes and Technologies for Cancer Control P50CA244693 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DRESSLER, EMILY VAN METER · 2019 to 2023
$4.1M
Vanderbilt Scholars in T4 Translational Research (V-STTaR) ProgramK12HL137943 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI KRIPALANI, SUNIL, ROUMIE, CHRISTIANNE L. · 2017 to 2021
$2.9M
Implementation of Smoking Cessation Services within NCI NCORP Community Sites with Organized Lung Cancer Screening ProgramsR01CA207158 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CHILES, CAROLINE, FOLEY, KRISTIE L · 2016 to 2020
$2.2M
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2021YIA-9865677411LUNGevity Foundation (LUNGevity) Research Scholars Award 2021-08National Cancer Institute (NCI) P30CA068485National Cancer Institute (NCI) R01CA207158National Cancer Institute (NCI) UG1CA189824NCI NIH HHS P30 CA068485NCI NIH HHS P50 CA244693NCI NIH HHS R01 CA207158NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189824NHLBI NIH HHS K12 HL137943
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo plan cessation services and advance health equity, understanding factors related to cessation readiness and differences among patients presenting for lung cancer screening (LCS) is imperative.

methodsWe recruited smoking patients, ages 55 to 77 years, presenting for LCS in 26 community-based imaging clinics participating in an NCI Community Oncology Research Program site-randomized trial (WF-20817CD, UG1CA189824). We collected outcomes of smoking cessation readiness to change and quitting self-efficacy immediately prior to screening. Linear mixed models were constructed with site random effects to assess associations of outcomes and baseline characteristics.

resultsParticipants (N = 1,094; age = 63.7; 81.9% White, 13.3% Black, 2.6% Hispanic, 2.3% American Indian, 20.2% nonmetro) were even by gender (50.8% women) and educational attainment (51.1% ≤ high school education). Participants smoked an average of 17.2 cigarettes per day (SD = 9.6), with a mean pack-year of 46.1 (SD = 25.0). Predictors of increased cessation readiness included the following: being a man, increased worry about lung cancer, increased perceived benefits of quitting, a quit attempt within the past year, and smoking ≤10 cigarettes per day. Predictors of increased quitting self-efficacy included the following: non-White race/ethnicity, men, less education, no use of other tobacco products, increased perceived benefits of quitting, a quit attempt within the past year, and smoking ≤10 cigarettes per day.

conclusionsTo support cessation among patients undergoing LCS, imaging clinics and health systems should recognize that prescreening readiness to quit varies by population subgroups. Imaging clinics may benefit from a tailored approach that works with patients "where they are." IMPACT: These findings suggest that gender, race, and ethnicity are associated with smoking cessation readiness and quitting self-efficacy.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerLung NeoplasmsSmokersSmoking CessationAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSelf EfficacyTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID40694048
PMCPMC12434596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.