Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40694041›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

Increased listening effort and cochlear neural degeneration underlie speech-in-noise deficits in normal-hearing middle-aged adults.

Maggie E Zink, Leslie Zhen, Jacie R McHaney, Jennifer Klara, Kimberly Yurasits, Victoria E Cancel, Olivia Flemm, Claire Mitchell, Jyotishka Datta, Bharath Chandresekaran and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Neural Hearing Loss: Mechanisms, Diagnosis and Treatment Horizons.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Maggie E Zink *Department of Communication Science and Disorders, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2018-2772
Leslie Zhen *Department of Communication Science and Disorders, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States.
Jacie R McHaney *Department of Communication Science and Disorders, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States.
Jennifer KlaraDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States.
Kimberly YurasitsDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States.
Victoria E CancelDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States.
Olivia FlemmDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States.
Claire MitchellDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States.
Jyotishka DattaDepartment of Statistics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, United States.
Bharath ChandresekaranDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States.
Aravindakshan ParthasarathyDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4573-8004

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001857 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2016 to 2025
$129.3M
Training in Auditory and Vestibular NeuroscienceT32DC011499 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Karl Kandler, BILL J YATES · 2011 to 2026
$3.0M
Request for Zeiss 710 multiphoton 5Live Duoscan MicroscopeS10RR028478 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WATKINS, SIMON C · 2011 to 2011
$1.1M
Research Supplement - Luz AndrinoR21DC018882 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PARTHASARATHY, ARAVINDAKSHAN · 2022 to 2024
$666k
Neural Mechanisms of Speech Perception in Noise in Middle-AgeF31DC020085 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MCHANEY, JACIE R · 2022 to 2022
$49k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001857NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR028478NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC020085NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC018882NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC011499NIH HHS F31DC020085NIH HHS R21DC018882NIH HHS T32DC011499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Middle age represents a critical period of accelerated brain changes and provides a window for early detection and intervention in age-related neurological decline. Hearing loss is a key early marker of such decline and is linked to numerous comorbidities in older adults. Yet, ~10% of middle-aged individuals who report hearing difficulties show normal audiograms. Cochlear neural degeneration (CND) could contribute to these hidden hearing deficits, though its role remains unclear due to a lack of objective diagnostics and uncertainty regarding its perceptual outcomes. Here, we employed a cross-species design to examine neural and behavioral signatures of CND. We measured envelope following responses (EFRs) - neural ensemble responses to sound originating from the peripheral auditory pathway - in young and middle-aged adults with normal audiograms and compared these responses to young and middle-aged Mongolian gerbils, where CND was histologically confirmed. We observed near-identical changes in EFRs across species that were associated with CND. Behavioral assessments revealed age-related speech-in-noise deficits under challenging conditions, while pupil-indexed listening effort increased with age even when behavioral performance was matched. Together, these results demonstrate that CND contributes to speech perception difficulties and elevated listening effort in midlife, which may ultimately lead to listening fatigue and social withdrawal.

Indexed as

CochleaNerve DegenerationNoiseSpeech PerceptionAdultAgingAnimalsFemaleGerbillinaeHumansMaleMiddle Agedcochlear synaptopathycross-speciesEFRshidden hearing losshumanlistening effortMongolian gerbilneuroscience

Identifiers

PMID40694041
PMCPMC12283073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.