ArticleArchives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists2025
Screening for Neurocognitive Deficits in Pediatrics-the Clinical Utility of the Pediatric Perceived Cognitive Functioning item bank.
Article in Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveEfficient screening for neurocognitive dysfunction is pivotal for timely intervention in at-risk populations in pediatrics. The Pediatric Perceived Cognitive Functioning (PedsPCF) item bank was developed for this purpose. We aimed to explore the relationship between, and the discriminative value of PedsPCF scores with neurocognitive outcomes and the behavior rating inventory of executive function parent report (BRIEF) in a pediatric population.
methodsThe PedsPCF parent- and self-report versions were added to neurocognitive testing batteries that were administered in clinical care or research in two Dutch academic pediatric hospitals. Most test batteries were individually tailored, resulting in a wide variety of measures. We determined Pearson correlations between the PedsPCF and neurocognitive test outcomes categorized into five neurocognitive domains as proposed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5, and the BRIEF-parent. Moreover, we assessed the discriminative values of PedsPCF deficit scores (M - 1 SD) for neurocognitive domain deficits (M - 1 SD) and the BRIEF-parent.
resultsThe PedsPCF was completed by 104 children and 106 parents. The parent-PedsPCF correlated with three neurocognitive domains and the BRIEF-parent but did not indicate deficits in any of the neurocognitive domains. The self-report PedsPCF correlated with a deficit in complex attention and the BRIEF-parent, and could indicate a deficit in complex attention only.
conclusionsAlthough the PedsPCF correlated with neurocognitive test outcomes, the discriminative value of the total score was limited. The short and freely available PedsPCF appears to add a useful subjective dimension to neurocognitive testing rather than a replacement of neurocognitive assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.