Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40693874›Full record

ArticleArchives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists2025

Screening for Neurocognitive Deficits in Pediatrics-the Clinical Utility of the Pediatric Perceived Cognitive Functioning item bank.

Marieke de Vries, Jan Pieter Marchal, Heleen Maurice-Stam, Berdien Mulder, Martha Grootenhuis, Femke K Aarsen, Andre B Rietman, Michiel A J Luijten, Kim J Oostrom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marieke de VriesDepartment of Development & Education of Youth in Diverse Societies, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2845-8956
Jan Pieter MarchalDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry & Psychosocial Care, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8269-5157
Heleen Maurice-StamPrincess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2055-3230
Berdien MulderDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry & Psychosocial Care, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Martha GrootenhuisPrincess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9632-248X
Femke K AarsenPrincess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0005-5219-7436
Andre B RietmanDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychology, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9004-0836
Michiel A J LuijtenDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry & Psychosocial Care, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8016-2859
Kim J OostromDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry & Psychosocial Care, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2718-3586

Funding

Research Priority Area Yield, University of Amsterdam
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEfficient screening for neurocognitive dysfunction is pivotal for timely intervention in at-risk populations in pediatrics. The Pediatric Perceived Cognitive Functioning (PedsPCF) item bank was developed for this purpose. We aimed to explore the relationship between, and the discriminative value of PedsPCF scores with neurocognitive outcomes and the behavior rating inventory of executive function parent report (BRIEF) in a pediatric population.

methodsThe PedsPCF parent- and self-report versions were added to neurocognitive testing batteries that were administered in clinical care or research in two Dutch academic pediatric hospitals. Most test batteries were individually tailored, resulting in a wide variety of measures. We determined Pearson correlations between the PedsPCF and neurocognitive test outcomes categorized into five neurocognitive domains as proposed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5, and the BRIEF-parent. Moreover, we assessed the discriminative values of PedsPCF deficit scores (M - 1 SD) for neurocognitive domain deficits (M - 1 SD) and the BRIEF-parent.

resultsThe PedsPCF was completed by 104 children and 106 parents. The parent-PedsPCF correlated with three neurocognitive domains and the BRIEF-parent but did not indicate deficits in any of the neurocognitive domains. The self-report PedsPCF correlated with a deficit in complex attention and the BRIEF-parent, and could indicate a deficit in complex attention only.

conclusionsAlthough the PedsPCF correlated with neurocognitive test outcomes, the discriminative value of the total score was limited. The short and freely available PedsPCF appears to add a useful subjective dimension to neurocognitive testing rather than a replacement of neurocognitive assessment.

Indexed as

Neurocognitive DisordersNeuropsychological TestsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMaleParentsPediatricsSelf ReportChildCognitionCognitive screeningParent reportPediatric psychologySelf report

Identifiers

PMID40693874
PMCPMC12644051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.