Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40693760›Full record

ArticlemSphere2025

Evaluation of V3-V4 and FL-16S rRNA amplicon sequencing approach for microbiota community analysis of tracheostomy aspirates.

A Gupta, V S Cooper, A C Zemke

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in mSphere, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Study on the Enrichment Effect ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A GuptaDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, Sleep and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
V S CooperMicrobiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
A C ZemkeDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, Sleep and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7722-6708

Funding

Drug resistance enablers and their role in antibiotic treatment failureU19AI158076 · NIAID · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI VAN OPIJNEN, TIM · 2022 to 2025
$10.0M
Tracheobronchitis in the Critically IllR01HL162964 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Anna Christine Zemke · 2022 to 2026
$2.2M
High-Throughput Computing for Genomics and Bioinformatics ResearchS10OD028483 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI LEE, ADRIAN V · 2021 to 2021
$574k
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases U19AI158076NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL162964NHLBI NIH HHS RO1 HL162964NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI158076NIH HHS S10 OD028483Pennsylvania Department of Health PA CURES Grant #4100085725
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Respiratory infections pose a significant risk for people requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation, yet limited information exists regarding the complex microbiome dynamics of people with tracheostomies during chronic critical illness. Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) long-read sequencing allows for full-length 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, providing enhanced species-level understanding of the respiratory microbiome. We validated ONT-based FL-16S amplicon sequencing for microbial insights from tracheal aspirates by comparing results with those of Illumina V3-V4 amplicon sequencing. Comparisons were made on a standardized microbial community and tracheal aspirates using multiple DNA extraction kits. Conventional short-read bioinformatic pipelines are suboptimal for processing longer, error-prone ONT reads. The Emu bioinformatics pipeline, specifically designed for ONT FL-16S reads, enhances the accuracy but necessitates validation for tracheal aspirates. In this study, we compared the analysis of FL-16S reads using Emu to the standardized V3-V4 read analysis with QIIME2. Our findings demonstrate that at the same sequencing read depth, FL-16S sequencing analysis with Emu yields comparable alpha and taxonomic diversity metrics, while providing superior species-level resolution compared to V3-V4 amplicon sequencing of tracheal aspirates. Our results show that tracheal aspirates during chronic critical illness are low-diversity samples, with most pathogenic genera represented by a single species. However, members of the oral microbiota IMPORTANCE: The role of the respiratory microbiome in shaping outcomes for patients with chronic critical illness undergoing prolonged mechanical ventilation via a tracheostomy remains poorly understood, despite its potential to drive infections and complicate recovery. Current methods, such as short-read 16S rRNA sequencing, lack taxonomic resolution to track pathogens at the species level, limiting clinical insights. Our study addresses this gap by validating ONT-based full-length (FL)-16S rRNA sequencing, a method that achieves species-level taxonomic precision critical for analyzing complex respiratory microbiomes. We benchmarked the microbiome composition of tracheal aspirates from ONT FL-16S rRNA workflows against Illumina V3-V4 data to demonstrate that long-read sequencing delivers comparable diversity profiles while resolving species-level diversity of clinically relevant species and microbes associated with the oral microbiome.

Indexed as

BacteriaMicrobiotaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNATracheostomyComputational BiologyDNA, BacterialHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansTracheaDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16Samplicon sequencingfull-length 16Smicrobiometracheostomy

Identifiers

PMID40693760
PMCPMC12379586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.