Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40693750›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2025

Eco-evolutionary robustness of wild bacterial communities to experimental perturbation.

Duhita G Sant, Thomas P Smith, Edgar L Y Wong, Juli Cohen, Kayla C King, Thomas Bell, Timothy G Barraclough

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Duhita G SantDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3SZ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6865-3161
Thomas P SmithDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Buckhurst Road, Ascot, Berkshire SL5 7PY, United Kingdom.
Edgar L Y WongDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3SZ, United Kingdom.
Juli CohenDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3SZ, United Kingdom.
Kayla C KingDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3SZ, United Kingdom.
Thomas BellDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Buckhurst Road, Ascot, Berkshire SL5 7PY, United Kingdom.
Timothy G BarracloughDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3SZ, United Kingdom.

Funding

National Environment Research Council NE/V011596/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most knowledge about bacterial evolution and ecological interactions comes from laboratory studies. One difference between the wild and most laboratory experiments is the diversity of bacterial taxa present. Understanding how wild bacteria respond to perturbation therefore requires consideration of how ecological sorting, colonization, and genetic changes of constituent species interact. Ecological sorting of species might reduce evolutionary rates and make communities robust to disturbance, or it could amplify selection pressures and lead to unstable co-evolutionary cascades. Even estimates of basic rates of ecological sorting, dispersal, and genetic change are rare. Here, we addressed these knowledge gaps by liming wild decomposer communities living in beech tree holes and tracking ecological and evolutionary responses for 12 weeks. Overall, tree hole communities were extremely robust to liming involving short-term pulses up to 4 pH units and long-term increases up to 2 pH units. Species diversity and composition displayed significant but small changes in treatment tree holes compared to control ones. New bacterial taxa colonized at a low rate that did not vary with liming. Genetic changes in the frequency of single nucleotide polymorphisms in metagenome assembled genomes occurred at rates that were both comparable to and correlated with ecological changes in the same metagenome assembled genomes, but the rate of genetic changes did not vary between limed and control tree holes. Analysis of rates of genetic change estimated low effective population size (~104) and generation times of roughly 1 day. Our study provides estimates of rates of ecological and evolutionary processes in wild bacterial communities, which displayed remarkable robustness to our experimental perturbation.

Indexed as

BacteriaBiological EvolutionMicrobiotaBiodiversityEcosystemFagusMetagenomePolymorphism, Single Nucleotideeco-evolutionary dynamicsexperimental evolutionlimingtree hole communities

Identifiers

PMID40693750
PMCPMC12743297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.