Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40693690›Full record

ArticleJournal of human trafficking2024

Aaron Murnan, Gwen England, Caneacha Matthews, Sam Boch, Islam Qasem, Samantha Bates, Sarah Manchak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human trafficking, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aaron MurnanDepartment of Population Health, College of Nursing, University of Cincinnati, 3110 Vine Street, Cincinnati, OH, USA, 45219.
Gwen EnglandCreating Autonomy Through Collaborative Healing (CATCH) Specialty Docket Court Program, Franklin County Municipal Court, 375 S High Street, Columbus, OH, 43215.
Caneacha MatthewsDepartment of Chemistry, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Cincinnati, 155 B Arts & Science Hall, Cincinnati, OH, 45221.
Sam BochDepartment of Population Health, College of Nursing, University of Cincinnati, 3110 Vine Street, Cincinnati, OH, USA, 45219.
Islam QasemDepartment of Population Health, College of Nursing, University of Cincinnati, 3110 Vine Street, Cincinnati, OH, USA, 45219.
Samantha BatesSchool of Social Work, The Ohio State University, 1947 N. College Road, Columbus, Ohio, 43210.
Sarah ManchakSchool of Criminal Justice, University of Cincinnati, PO Box 210389, TDC 600 Cincinnati, OH, 45221.

Funding

LCenter for Clinical and Translational Science and TrainingUL1TR001425 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI HEUBI, JAMES E., KISSELA, BRETT M · 2015 to 2024
$37.5M
A Unique, Co-Designed Family-Based Therapy for Women with Opioid Use Disorder and Justice-InvolvementK23DA058053 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI Aaron William Murnan · 2023 to 2026
$768k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001425NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA058053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex trafficking specialty court programs represent a structural approach to disrupt historic patterns of violence, health disparities, as well as counteract carceral recidivism issues. Despite the promise of these programs, inequities have been observed in women's access, entry, and success within such programs. The purpose of the current study was to understand perceptions and experiences underlying documented racial disparities in women's access to and retention within sex trafficking specialty court programs. Fifteen black women with histories of arrest for prostitution or solicitation were recruited to participate in interviews querying experiences with referral processes, factors associated with their admittance and retention, and factors influencing whether they ultimately participated in such a program. An inductive content analysis was used to analyze interview transcript data. Four groups of themes emerged after analyses: (a) perceptions and experiences with police and the criminal legal system; (b) perceptions of sex trafficking specialty court programs; (c) perceived barriers to participation; and (d) perceived facilitators of participation. This research provides meaningful context towards perceptions and experiences underlying previously observed disparities in women's referral to and success within sex trafficking specialty court programs. Findings provide insights towards practices that could bolster equity within these programs.

Indexed as

qualitative researchracial disparitiessex trafficking specialty court programs

Identifiers

PMID40693690
PMCPMC12221231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.