ArticleJournal of human trafficking2024
Article in Journal of human trafficking, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating family-based interventions into specialty court programs: qualitative guidance from sex trafficking specialty court participants and their supportive family members.Health & justice · 2026Article
- Characteristics, Experiences, and Perceptions of Family Members of Sex Trafficking Specialty Court Participants: An Exploratory Qualitative Inquiry.Journal of human trafficking · 2026Article
- Exploring racial disparities in sex trafficking special docket court programs.Social sciences & humanities open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sex trafficking specialty court programs represent a structural approach to disrupt historic patterns of violence, health disparities, as well as counteract carceral recidivism issues. Despite the promise of these programs, inequities have been observed in women's access, entry, and success within such programs. The purpose of the current study was to understand perceptions and experiences underlying documented racial disparities in women's access to and retention within sex trafficking specialty court programs. Fifteen black women with histories of arrest for prostitution or solicitation were recruited to participate in interviews querying experiences with referral processes, factors associated with their admittance and retention, and factors influencing whether they ultimately participated in such a program. An inductive content analysis was used to analyze interview transcript data. Four groups of themes emerged after analyses: (a) perceptions and experiences with police and the criminal legal system; (b) perceptions of sex trafficking specialty court programs; (c) perceived barriers to participation; and (d) perceived facilitators of participation. This research provides meaningful context towards perceptions and experiences underlying previously observed disparities in women's referral to and success within sex trafficking specialty court programs. Findings provide insights towards practices that could bolster equity within these programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.