SynthesisJournal of oral rehabilitation2025
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Application of Thickened Liquids to Treat Adults With Neurogenic Dysphagia.
Synthesis in Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThickened liquids have been one of the cornerstones of routine care to reduce aspiration for dysphagic patients in clinical practice. However, the evidence of this practice remains limited and uncertain.
aimsThis study aimed to systematically review and evaluate the effects of thickened liquid for adults with neurogenic dysphagia.
methodsFive electronic databases were searched (Pubmed, Embase via Ovid, CINAHL, Web of Science and Cochrane Library) from each database's inception date until 30th July 2024. Search terms included a combination of database-specific controlled vocabulary terms and free-text terms relating to 'dysphagia' and 'thickened food'. Study inclusion criteria focused on peer-reviewed published articles including randomised controlled trials (RCT), cohort studies, case-control studies and case series. Only studies with neurogenic data were included. Four reviewers independently performed the search, data extraction and analysis. The outcome measure was a change in (any) relevant clinical swallowing-related characteristic.
resultsA total of 2090 studies were identified, of which 16 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The risk of bias of studies was moderate to low. Five studies either focused exclusively on different components of swallowing physiology or were unable to provide sufficient or reliable data for analysis and were thus excluded from data synthesis. Data analysis was conducted between groups (thin liquid vs. thickened liquid) concerning penetration (n = 5) and aspiration (n = 8), Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS) scores (n = 4), unsafe swallowing (n = 7) and residue (n = 5). The results showed that thickened liquids improved swallowing safety, including reductions in aspiration events (([95% CI] = 0.49 [0.28, 0.88]; p = 0.02; I
conclusionThe current evidence, based mainly on non-randomised controlled trials, suggests that thickeners may help improve swallowing safety for neurogenic dysphagia, but this evidence remains weak. Further RCT evidence is needed to validate the clinical efficacy of thickeners.
trial registrationINPLASY International Platform for Registered Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses Program: INPLASY202510011.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.