Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40693595›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2025

The impact of religiosity, anxiety and depression on proneness to auditory hallucinations in healthy individuals.

Chiara Lucafò, Irene Ceccato, Gianluca Malatesta, Rocco Palumbo, Nicola Mammarella, Alberto Di Domenico, Luca Tommasi, Giulia Prete

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chiara LucafòDepartment of Psychology, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9126-0128
Irene CeccatoDepartment of Psychology, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4819-2120
Gianluca MalatestaDepartment of Psychology, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7658-2364
Rocco PalumboDepartment of Psychology, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2385-5840
Nicola MammarellaDepartment of Psychology, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1240-702X
Alberto Di DomenicoDepartment of Psychology, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9962-2891
Luca TommasiDepartment of Psychology, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Giulia PreteDepartment of Psychology, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9969-6404

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAuditory hallucinations (hearing voices in the absence of physical stimuli) are present in clinical conditions, but they are also experienced less frequently by healthy individuals. In the non-clinical population, auditory hallucinations are described more often as positive and not intrusive; indeed, they have received less attention.

aimsThe present study explores the phenomenology of non-clinical auditory hallucinations and their possible relationship with religiosity.

methodStarting from previous findings suggesting that non-clinical auditory hallucinations are often described as a gift or a way to be connected with 'someone else', we administered standardised questionnaires to quantify proneness to experiencing auditory hallucinations, religiosity and anxiety/depression scores.

resultsRegression analysis carried out using an auditory hallucinations, index as the dependent variable on a final sample of 680 responders revealed that a total of 31% of the variance was explained by a five-steps model including demographic characteristics (i.e. being young, a woman and a non-believer) and negative (e.g. being afraid of otherworldly punishments) and positive (e.g. believing in benevolent supernatural forces) components of religiosity, anxiety and depression. Crucially, compared with believers, non-believers revealed higher scores in depression, anxiety and in a specific questionnaire measuring proneness to auditory hallucinations.

conclusionsResults suggests that religiosity acts as a potential protective factor for proneness to paranormal experiences, but a complex relationship emerges between religious beliefs, mood alterations and unusual experiences.

Indexed as

anxietyAuditory hallucinationsdepressionreligiosityvoice hearing

Identifiers

PMID40693595
PMCPMC12303831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.