Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40693537›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2025

Comparative Analyses of Four Reference Genomes Reveal Exceptional Diversity and Weak Linked Selection in the Yellow Monkeyflower (Mimulus guttatus) Complex.

John T Lovell, Rachel Walstead, Amelia Lawrence, Evan Stark-Dykema, Matthew C Farnitano, Avril Harder, Tomáš Brůna, Kerrie Barry, David Goodstein, Jerry Jenkins and 12 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pangenomics in the Mimulus guttatus Species Complex.Molecular ecology resources · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

John T LovellGenome Sequencing Center, HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, Alabama, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8938-1166
Rachel WalsteadGenome Sequencing Center, HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, Alabama, USA.
Amelia LawrenceDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Evan Stark-DykemaDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA.
Matthew C FarnitanoDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6736-232X
Avril HarderGenome Sequencing Center, HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, Alabama, USA.
Tomáš BrůnaUS Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, California, USA.
Kerrie BarryUS Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, California, USA.
David GoodsteinUS Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, California, USA.
Jerry JenkinsGenome Sequencing Center, HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, Alabama, USA.
Anna LipzenUS Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, California, USA.
LoriBeth BostonGenome Sequencing Center, HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, Alabama, USA.
Jenell WebberGenome Sequencing Center, HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, Alabama, USA.
Mansi ChovatiaUS Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, California, USA.
Joanne EichenbergerUS Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, California, USA.
Jayson TalagArizona Genomics Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Jane GrimwoodGenome Sequencing Center, HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, Alabama, USA.
Jeremy SchmutzGenome Sequencing Center, HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, Alabama, USA.
John K KellyDepartment of Ecology & Evolution, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9480-1252
Andrea L SweigartDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Lila FishmanDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7297-9049
John H WillisDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Division of Environmental Biology DEB-1856180U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute DE-AC02-05CH11231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Yellow monkeyflowers (Mimulus guttatus complex, Phrymaceae) are a powerful system for studying ecological adaptation, reproductive variation, and genome evolution. To initiate pan-genomics in this group, we present four chromosome-scale assemblies and annotations of accessions spanning a broad evolutionary spectrum: two from a single M. guttatus population, one from the closely related selfing species M. nasutus, and one from a more divergent species M. tilingii. All assemblies are highly complete and resolve centromeric and repetitive regions. Comparative analyses reveal such extensive structural variation in repeat-rich, gene-poor regions that large portions of the genome are unalignable across accessions. As a result, this Mimulus pan-genome is primarily informative in genic regions, underscoring limitations of resequencing approaches in such polymorphic taxa. We document gene presence-absence, investigate the recombination landscape using high-resolution linkage data, and quantify nucleotide diversity. Surprisingly, pairwise differences at fourfold synonymous sites are exceptionally high-even in regions of very low recombination-reaching ~3.2% within a single M. guttatus population, ~7% within the interfertile M. guttatus species complex (approximately equal to SNP divergence between great apes and Old World monkeys), and ~7.4% between that complex and the reproductively isolated M. tilingii. Genome-wide patterns of nucleotide variation show little evidence of linked selection, and instead suggest that the concentration of genes (and likely selected sites) in high-recombination regions may buffer diversity loss. These assemblies, annotations, and comparative analyses provide a robust genomic foundation for Mimulus research and offer new insights into the interplay of recombination, structural variation, and molecular evolution in highly diverse plant genomes.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationGenome, PlantMimulusSelection, GeneticEvolution, MolecularRecombination, Geneticchromosomal evolutionlinked selectionMimulusnucleotide diversityrecombinationreference genomes

Identifiers

PMID40693537
PMCPMC12550471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.