Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40693327›Full record

Trial reportPhysiological reports2025

Exploratory analyses of meal-induced heartburn identify distinct clinical phenotypes of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Jerry D Gardner, George Triadafilopoulos

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Physiological reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jerry D GardnerScience for Organizations, Mill Valley, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9642-864X
George TriadafilopoulosDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4233-3773

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Symptoms in symptomatic GERD patients result from esophageal acid exposure and are treated with agents that inhibit gastric acid secretion. We analyzed data from a clinical trial evaluating the effect of ranitidine plus antacid on heartburn severity in GERD patients. After 26 subjects ingested a standard meal and received either placebo or ranitidine-antacid, heartburn severity (assessed via a visual analog scale), esophageal pH, and gastric pH were measured at 15-min intervals. Two phenotypes emerged based on heartburn severity patterns: "Persistent Heartburn" (PH), characterized by sustained high severity, and "Non-persistent Heartburn" (NPH), where severity peaked and then declined. PH subjects had similar gastric acidity but higher overall heartburn severity and lower esophageal acid exposure than NPH subjects. Both phenotypes exhibited esophageal hyperalgesia, with significant heartburn even at esophageal pH above 4.0, and hyperalgesia was more pronounced in PH subjects. These findings suggest that esophageal sensitivity, rather than acid exposure alone, contributes to symptom severity. The differing responses to placebo and ranitidine-antacid highlight potential mechanisms underlying treatment failure in some GERD patients, emphasizing the need for tailored therapeutic approaches.

Indexed as

Gastroesophageal RefluxHeartburnMealsAdultAntacidsDouble-Blind MethodEsophagusFemaleGastric AcidHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMaleMiddle AgedPhenotypeRanitidineAntacidsRanitidinegastroesophageal reflux diseaseheartburnphenotypes

Identifiers

PMID40693327
PMCPMC12280805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.