ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2025
A qualitative exploration of STI partner notification services delivery models among key stakeholders in rural southwestern Uganda.
Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Comprehensive STI care requires not only patient treatment but STI partner notification (PN) and evaluation to prevent ongoing STI transmission and reinfection. In rural, southwestern Uganda, we explored healthcare practitioners' views on three STI PN models that focused on task-shifting to non-physician practitioners to inform the development of a novel STI PN services delivery system. Methods: From September to November 2023, we conducted individual in-depth interviews with 32 participants from 4 categories (8 participants from each category): patients with a self-reported history of having an STI in Uganda, healthcare workers (physicians, nurses, and community health workers), pharmacists, and healthcare administrators (Ministry of Health officials and regional referral hospital administrators). Interviews explored participants' views on a nursing-based, pharmacy-based, and community-based STI PN models as well as healthcare system tools and needs to facilitate PN. We used inductive and deductive approaches to generate a codebook guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research in a thematic analysis. Results: Ten female and twenty-two male participants participated in individual in-depth interviews. The median age of the patient and healthcare practitioner participants was 32 and 34 years, respectively. We found that (1) the nursing model was overall supported as nurses (though with one participant noting dissatisfaction with nurses), (2) pharmacies are well-positioned to engage in STI PN as they are early points of contact for patients, incentivized monetarily by PN and patient-delivered partner medication, and have the potential to physically restructure to create private spaces and increase counseling training, (3) the community-based model should center on village health teams and focus on advocacy and education. Conclusion: Given the high STI incidence globally and in sub-Saharan Africa, exploring innovative STI care models that resonate with patients and healthcare practitioners will be important. Future work includes a Delphi method to refine these models for testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.