ArticleRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2025
Evaluating health systems through ambulatory care-sensitive conditions.
Article in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cross-country analysis of health systems and hospital utilization across the Amazon.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2026Article
- Preventable hospitalizations due to ambulatory care sensitive conditions in Latin America (2015-2019): a multi-country descriptive analysis.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ambulatory care-sensitive conditions are those for which effective primary health care services could prevent hospitalizations or mitigate severe complications. Hospital admissions for these conditions have been used to measure the effectiveness of primary health care. We review and compare lists of these conditions developed by national and international health entities to explore their applicability to diverse health care systems, the conditions included and the methodological challenges of making cross-country comparisons. While ambulatory care-sensitive conditions can provide a framework for assessing the performance of health care systems, the relevance of specific conditions or lists depends on the local epidemiological context. Countries have developed lists to address their specific context and priorities, for example, with Brazil focusing on infectious diseases and the United Kingdom emphasizing chronic conditions. We explore case studies of how analyses of these conditions can inform policy aimed at improving the effectiveness and accessibility of primary health care, provide evidence about the prevalence and sociodemographic heterogeneity of these conditions, and how they can be used for cross-country comparisons. The findings underscore the importance of developing context-specific lists of ambulatory care-sensitive conditions when evaluating the performance of primary health care services, promoting informed policy decisions and guiding resource allocation in health care systems. Standardized data collection and coding practices are required to enable meaningful cross-country comparisons and to ensure the effective use of these conditions as a tool to assess and monitor health system performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.