ArticleVocations and learning2025
Exploring professional vision of vet students and tutors: noticing, evaluating and reasoning about practice.
Article in Vocations and learning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In dual vocational education and training (VET) programs, students learn across school and work contexts. Educators in both these contexts reside in different socio-cultural practices and can have different or even contradicting views on practice, influencing their guidance. In this study, we used the concept of professional vision to explore differing views on practice between participants with various educational roles, namely students, school teachers and workplace supervisors. In total, 11 students, 11 school teachers and seven workplace supervisors were asked to view the same set of five videos showing apprentices in the domain of underground infrastructure performing domain-specific tasks. Participants were asked to explain what they noticed in the videos and evaluate the apprentices' performance. The data analysis consisted of a mixed-method approach. We quantitatively compared how educational roles viewed and evaluated task performance, followed by a qualitative ventriloquial analysis of their reasoning. Our findings highlight the diversity in professional vision among participants. Participants focused on different elements of practice, evaluated the same elements differently and showed variations in their reasoning. However, this could only be partly explained by their educational role. These findings suggest a need to prepare VET students for the different views of practice they will encounter during their careers, ultimately forming their well-founded professional vision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.