Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40693254›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Use of telebehavioral health services by critical access hospitals in the United States: A qualitative study of the impacts of medicare flexibilities and future opportunities.

Christopher M Shea, Sharita Thomas, Marah Maaita, Heidi O'Connor, Yvonne Jonk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christopher M SheaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7437-7607
Sharita ThomasDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9227-2761
Marah MaaitaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5785-1665
Heidi O'ConnorDepartment of Public Health, University of Southern Maine, Portland, ME, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3881-6992
Yvonne JonkDepartment of Public Health, University of Southern Maine, Portland, ME, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3309-3445

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study examined the delivery of telehealth for behavioral health services among Critical Access Hospitals (CAH). More specifically, we describe how CAHs representatives reported using telebehavioral health (TBH) to meet the behavioral health needs of patients, identify ways in which Medicare billing flexibility did or did not affect TBH use and behavioral health staffing among CAHs, and explore opportunities and challenges CAHs face for using TBH in the future. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews of CAH administrators and providers to examine the circumstances under which TBH was used. Results: The extent of TBH use varied across CAHs in our sample; however, provider-to-provider consultations were generally more common in the inpatient and ED settings, with provider-to-patient encounters being more common in outpatient clinics. Medicare flexibilities, such as allowing a patient's home as an eligible originating site and reimbursement for audio-only visits, were reported to be useful by many participants, although staffing changes resulting from the flexibilities were not commonly reported. Concerns about reimbursement levels for behavioral health and uncertainty about reimbursement telehealth in the future were common. Lack of availability of behavioral health providers and administrative staff to support telehealth compounded challenges of planning for telehealth within uncertain policy and reimbursement conditions. Conclusion: Telehealth has potential to close the rural-urban access gaps, but CAHs likely will need supportive policies and technical assistance to meet their communities' needs with TBH.

Indexed as

behavioral healthcritical access hospitalspublic health emergencyTelehealth

Identifiers

PMID40693254
PMCPMC12277669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.