ArticleDigital health
Public perceptions of pharmacy services: Perceived importance and face-to-face preference across service stages in the era of digital health.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Public perceptions of remote delivery of OTC medication counselling in community pharmacies in South Korea.BMC public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In the era of digital health, pharmacy services are rapidly evolving, yet remote service delivery remains legally restricted in South Korea. This study addresses the public perception of pharmacy services, with a particular focus on perceived importance and preferences for face-to-face interactions across the predispensing, dispensing, and postdispensing stages, especially in relation to patient-pharmacist communication. Methods: A web-based survey was conducted with 1000 South Korean adults to quantify perceived service importance and delivery mode preferences across each service stage. Respondents were categorized into Assertive, Passive, and None groups based on their perceived style of communication with pharmacists. Results: Participants were classified into Assertive (17.2%), Passive (54.0%), and None (28.8%) communication groups. Pharmacy services were analyzed by stage-predispensing, dispensing, and postdispensing-and perceptions of service importance, actual provision, and preferences for face-to-face delivery varied accordingly. The dispensing stage was consistently rated highest across all measures, and communication style was positively associated with each measure. Prior telemedicine experience was linked to greater openness to remote services, whereas digital health literacy showed no significant association. Conclusion: Face-to-face interactions remain essential for pharmacy service delivery, particularly during the dispensing and counseling stages. Preferences for delivery methods vary by communication style, underscoring the importance of fostering effective patient-pharmacist communication. To enhance trust, satisfaction, and adherence, future models should integrate digital health technologies with meaningful in-person engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.