Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40693251›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Public perceptions of pharmacy services: Perceived importance and face-to-face preference across service stages in the era of digital health.

Dong-Wook Yang, Youran Noh, Kyung-Bok Son

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dong-Wook YangSchool of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8546-4714
Youran NohCollege of Pharmacy, Hanyang University, Ansan, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9765-2598
Kyung-Bok SonCollege of Pharmacy, Hanyang University, Ansan, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6343-5808

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In the era of digital health, pharmacy services are rapidly evolving, yet remote service delivery remains legally restricted in South Korea. This study addresses the public perception of pharmacy services, with a particular focus on perceived importance and preferences for face-to-face interactions across the predispensing, dispensing, and postdispensing stages, especially in relation to patient-pharmacist communication. Methods: A web-based survey was conducted with 1000 South Korean adults to quantify perceived service importance and delivery mode preferences across each service stage. Respondents were categorized into Assertive, Passive, and None groups based on their perceived style of communication with pharmacists. Results: Participants were classified into Assertive (17.2%), Passive (54.0%), and None (28.8%) communication groups. Pharmacy services were analyzed by stage-predispensing, dispensing, and postdispensing-and perceptions of service importance, actual provision, and preferences for face-to-face delivery varied accordingly. The dispensing stage was consistently rated highest across all measures, and communication style was positively associated with each measure. Prior telemedicine experience was linked to greater openness to remote services, whereas digital health literacy showed no significant association. Conclusion: Face-to-face interactions remain essential for pharmacy service delivery, particularly during the dispensing and counseling stages. Preferences for delivery methods vary by communication style, underscoring the importance of fostering effective patient-pharmacist communication. To enhance trust, satisfaction, and adherence, future models should integrate digital health technologies with meaningful in-person engagement.

Indexed as

communicationCommunity pharmacy servicesface-to-facepreferenceSouth Korea

Identifiers

PMID40693251
PMCPMC12277562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.