ArticleJournal of clinical and translational research2024
Resource management and capacity planning for clinical trial sites.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a pediatric urgent care research infrastructure to facilitate human immunology studies.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Article
- Scoping review of oncology clinical trials nursing: Roles, competencies, and evolving practice in cancer research.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026Article
- Harmonizing interactions between clinical trial sponsors and study research sites: An appraisal of the key challenges and recommendations for addressing them.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Review
- Prospective evaluation of the adapted Ontario Protocol Assessment Level score for predicting clinical research coordinator workload: An internal validation study.Journal of clinical and translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Since 2020, the number of registered clinical trials has surged by over 30%, significantly increasing the demand for skilled coordinators. Despite this growth, a national shortage of qualified coordinators remains, driven by escalating responsibilities and workloads. Effective resource management is crucial for retention. While the Ontario Protocol Assessment Level (OPAL) helps quantify trial complexity, it overlooks key factors such as organizational structure and budget constraints that impact coordinator productivity. This project aims to refine the OPAL score by integrating it with longitudinal coordinator effort data, improving resource allocation, operational efficiency, and job satisfaction, thereby reducing burnout and turnover. Aim: The aim of this study was to reduce burnout and turnover, ultimately contributing to the overall success of clinical trials. Methods: Actively enrolling interventional studies with corresponding coordinator effort tracking from June 1, 2022, to December 1, 2022, were included in the database. Protocols were graded using an adapted protocol assessment tool. Descriptive statistics compared protocol characteristics to the adapted assessment score and tracked coordinator hours, while Student's t-test and univariate analysis evaluated differences in continuous variables. Linear regression analysis assessed the association between the adapted score and the coordinator effort. Results: Seven protocols were analyzed: five (71%) were federally funded, two (29%) were industry-sponsored; four (57%) were behavioral interventions, and three (43%) were drug studies. Significant differences were observed between industry-sponsored and federally funded studies (7.25 ± 1.77 vs. 6.45 ± 1.65; Conclusion: The adapted protocol complexity scores predict coordinator effort, aiding in capacity assessment and objective project distribution. Relevance for Patients: The findings from this project can inform more precise resource allocation, potentially leading to higher-quality studies and enhanced participant safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.